Effect of testing conditions and filtration mechanisms on SDI

Abstract The Silt Density Index is applied world-wide for many decades to determine the fouling potential of feed water of reverse osmosis systems and more recently to judge the performance of micro- and ultrafiltration systems. However there are growing doubts about the reproducibility and accuracy of this test. Currently, the Silt Density Index (SDI) is applied without any correction for temperature, applied pressure and membrane resistance. Besides that, the SDI is not based on any fouling mechanism which affects its reproducibility and accuracy. To identify opportunities for improvements, existing mathematical fouling models were further extended to study the effect of temperature, applied pressure and membrane resistance on the SDI value under four different fouling mechanisms. Significant variations in SDI values are observed mathematically as a result of differences in temperature and membrane resistance for the same water quality. The fouling mechanisms are described by the relationship between the filtrated volume w and the total resistance R . The sensitivity of the SDI for variations in the testing parameters theoretically increases when the relation between w and R is stronger. The SDI increases with an increase in feed temperature and applied pressure. Temperature has a substantial effect on SDI. As a consequence it is not recommended to compare SDI values measured at different temperatures. The SDI value decreases when membranes with a high resistance are used. To achieve a more reliable SDI, the use of a standardized membrane with constant properties, in particular having a narrow resistance range, is recommended.

[1]  Gilbert Galjaard,et al.  Monitoring particulate fouling in membrane systems , 1998 .

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling , 2005 .

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of colloidal fouling and feed water recovery on salt rejection of RO and NF membranes , 2004 .

[4]  Helge Toutenburg,et al.  Linear models : least squares and alternatives , 1999 .

[5]  Taro Urase,et al.  Change in membrane performance due to organic fouling in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) applications , 2007 .

[6]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Biofouling potential of chemicals used for scale control in RO and NF membranes , 2000 .

[7]  Ben H.L. Betlem,et al.  Dynamic optimization of a dead-end filtration trajectory: Blocking filtration laws , 2006 .

[8]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water , 1980 .

[9]  Zeyad S. Tarawneh,et al.  The MFI-UF as a water quality test and monitor , 2003 .

[10]  T. Chartier,et al.  Dispersion of alpha-alumina ultrafine powders using 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid for the implementation of a DCC process , 2005 .

[11]  V. Tarabara,et al.  Pore blocking mechanisms during early stages of membrane fouling by colloids. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  P.A.C. Bonné,et al.  Prediction of flux decline in membrane systems due to particulate fouling , 1997 .

[13]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[14]  L. Y. Dudley,et al.  Biofouling in membrane systems — A review☆ , 1998 .

[15]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[16]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Silt Density Index and Modified Fouling Index relation, and effect of pressure, temperature and membrane resistance , 2011 .

[17]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. , 2009, Water research.

[18]  Maria D. Kennedy,et al.  Applications of the MFI-UF to measure and predict particulate fouling in RO systems , 2003 .

[19]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  Predicting flux decline of reverse osmosis membranes , 1981 .

[20]  P.A.C. Bonné,et al.  Scaling control of RO membranes and direct treatment of surface water , 2000 .

[21]  A. Nahrstedt,et al.  New insights into silt density index and modified fouling index measurements , 2008 .