Cognitive Traffic Anomaly Prediction from GPS Trajectories Using Visible Outlier Indexes and Meshed Spatiotemporal Neighborhoods

The advancement of cognitive computing for traffic status understanding, powered by machine learning and data analytics, enables prediction of traffic anomalies from continuously generated big GPS trajectory data. Existing methods generally use traffic indicators such as traffic flows and speeds to detect anomalies, but they may over-identify anomalies while missing the critical ones. For example, they use historical anomalies to train the prediction model, but past anomalies may not be a perfect indication of future anomalies since anomalies are often rare. In this paper, we propose a novel cognitive approach, a Visible Outlier Indexes and Meshed Spatiotemporal Neighborhoods (VOI-MSN) method, to predict traffic anomalies from GPS trajectories. In the VOI-MSN method, two cognitive techniques are provided. The first is VOI, which measures the abnormal scores using overall samples and can be intuitively understood by humans. The second is MSN, which learns the dynamic impact range (i.e., spatiotemporal neighborhood) from historical trajectory data and provides a complete and exact analysis of the local traffic situation. It emulates human cognitive processing to adaptively judge the impact range by experience. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated using a massive trajectory dataset with 2.5 billion location records for 27,266 taxis, and it achieves higher precision and recall in predicting traffic anomalies than the counterpart methods. The VOI-MSN method achieves high accuracy and recall for predicting traffic anomalies. It outperforms traffic indicator–based (speed and traffic flow) methods, the fixed-size spatial neighborhood method and the causal network method.

[1]  Zhixiao Wang,et al.  A Trajectory Data Clustering Method Based On Dynamic Grid Density , 2015 .

[2]  Dawei Chen,et al.  Research on Traffic Flow Prediction in the Big Data Environment Based on the Improved RBF Neural Network , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  S. Goodman,et al.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations , 2016, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[4]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Real-Time Road Traffic Anomaly Detection , 2014 .

[5]  Francisco Bravo,et al.  Real-time crash prediction in an urban expressway using disaggregated data , 2018 .

[6]  Jing He,et al.  Discovery of stop regions for understanding repeat travel behaviors of moving objects , 2016, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Wei Liu,et al.  Density-based Outlier Detection by Local Outlier Factor on Largescale Traffic Data , 2016 .

[8]  Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf,et al.  SwordPlots: Exploring Neuron Behavior within Dynamic Communities of Brain Networks , 2016, HVEI.

[9]  Xing Xie,et al.  Discovering spatio-temporal causal interactions in traffic data streams , 2011, KDD.

[10]  XiaoYuanhui A fast algorithm for two-dimensional KolmogorovSmirnov two sample tests , 2017 .

[11]  Sanjay Chawla,et al.  Inferring the Root Cause in Road Traffic Anomalies , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining.

[12]  Zhonghui Chen,et al.  Short-term traffic flow prediction with optimized Multi-kernel Support Vector Machine , 2017, 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[13]  Xuan Song,et al.  Learning Deep Representation from Big and Heterogeneous Data for Traffic Accident Inference , 2016, AAAI.

[14]  Cheng Long,et al.  A New Framework for Traffic Anomaly Detection , 2014, SDM.

[15]  Shi An,et al.  Detecting Traffic Anomalies in Urban Areas Using Taxi GPS Data , 2015 .

[16]  Manoranjan Parida,et al.  Short term traffic flow prediction in heterogeneous condition using artificial neural network , 2013 .

[17]  Weidi Dai,et al.  Discovering Traffic Outlier Causal Relationship Based on Anomalous DAG , 2015, ICSI.

[18]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we’re going , 2014 .

[19]  Lionel M. Ni,et al.  Detecting and Analyzing Urban Regions with High Impact of Weather Change on Transport , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[20]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Knowledge Discovery and Causality in Urban City Traffic: A study using Planet Scale Vehicular Imagery Data , 2013, IWCTS '13.

[21]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Understanding City Traffic Dynamics Utilizing Sensor and Textual Observations , 2016, AAAI.

[22]  Javier A. Barria,et al.  Detection and Classification of Traffic Anomalies Using Microscopic Traffic Variables , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Jerry Chun-Wei Lin,et al.  Adapted K-Nearest Neighbors for Detecting Anomalies on Spatio–Temporal Traffic Flow , 2019, IEEE Access.

[24]  Jianxin Li,et al.  Root Cause Analysis of Traffic Anomalies Using Uneven Diffusion Model , 2019, IEEE Access.

[25]  Chaogui Kang,et al.  Exploring time-dependent traffic congestion patterns from taxi trajectory data , 2015, 2015 2nd IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services (ICSDM).

[26]  Shangdong Liu,et al.  Discovering Traffic Anomaly Propagation in Urban Space Using Traffic Change Peaks , 2019, ICDS.

[27]  Sanjay Chawla,et al.  On detection of emerging anomalous traffic patterns using GPS data , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[28]  An Shi,et al.  Prediction of Urban Traffic Abnormity Based on Causal Network , 2015, 2015 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA).

[29]  Yunsi Fei,et al.  Traffic and vehicle speed prediction with neural network and Hidden Markov model in vehicular networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[30]  Meead Saberi,et al.  Anomalous Data Detection in Vehicular Networks Using Traffic Flow Theory , 2019, 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall).

[31]  Li Pan,et al.  Predicting Short-Term Traffic Flow by Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity).