Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Daniel Fogerty,et al. Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] K. Patterson,et al. Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. , 1987 .
[3] James R. Booth,et al. Functional Anatomy of Intra- and Cross-Modal Lexical Tasks , 2002, NeuroImage.
[4] Dennis H. Klatt,et al. Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .
[5] C. Watson,et al. Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Donald Shankweiler,et al. Phonological processes in literacy : a tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman , 1991 .
[7] C. Spence,et al. Auditory perception: Interactions with vision , 2010 .
[8] Christopher T. Lovelace,et al. An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[9] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[10] Bernard Mazoyer,et al. Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks , 2007, NeuroImage.
[11] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[12] J. B. Wyman,et al. What is reading ability , 1921 .
[13] Elkan G. Akyürek,et al. Temporal integration of consecutive tones into synthetic vowels demonstrates perceptual assembly in audition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[15] Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al. Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1992 .
[16] M. Coltheart,et al. Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .
[17] Thomas G. Devine. Listening and Reading. , 1976 .
[18] P F Seitz,et al. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] L. Humes,et al. Reconstructing Wholes From Parts: Effects of Modality, Age, and Hearing Loss on Word Recognition , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[20] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[21] Christopher I. Petkov,et al. Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration , 2011, Hearing Research.
[22] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[23] Ana Torralbo,et al. Perceptual-Load-Induced Selection as a Result of Local Competitive Interactions in Visual Cortex , 2008, Psychological science.
[24] M. Mesulam,et al. From sensation to cognition. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[25] Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al. Basic research in speech and lateralization of language: Some implications for reading disability , 1971 .
[26] K. Grant,et al. Measures of auditory-visual integration for speech understanding: a theoretical perspective. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] D. Reisberg,et al. Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. , 1987 .
[28] Philipos C. Loizou,et al. Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .
[29] G F Smoorenburg,et al. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Erica B. Michael,et al. fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes , 2001, Human brain mapping.
[31] James L. McClelland,et al. Visual factors in word perception , 1973 .
[32] K. Grant,et al. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Dominic W. Massaro,et al. Visual Information Processing in Reading , 1993 .
[34] Tammo Houtgast,et al. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[35] Deniz Başkent,et al. Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: links to linguistic and cognitive abilities. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] Sam Duker,et al. Listening and Reading , 1965, The Elementary School Journal.
[37] Paul Duchnowski,et al. A speechreading aid based on phonetic ASR , 1998, ICSLP.
[38] T. Houtgast,et al. Audiovisual Perception of Speech in Noise and Masked Written Text , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[39] Martin Cooke,et al. Making Sense of Everyday Speech: a Glimpsing Account , 2005, Speech Separation by Humans and Machines.
[40] H. Komatsu. The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[41] R. M. Warren,et al. Perceptual synthesis of deleted phonemes , 1979 .
[42] J A Bashford,et al. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong “bottom-up” cues for phonemic restoration , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[43] Mary E. Curtis,et al. Development of Components of Reading Skill. , 1980 .
[44] J Verschuure,et al. Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[45] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: Evidence from early and late ERP effects , 2006, Brain Research.
[46] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. On the generality of the perceptual closure effect. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[47] W. Olsen,et al. Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report. , 1998, American journal of audiology.
[48] M. Daneman,et al. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] Joel R. Meyer,et al. Modality-specific and -independent developmental differences in the neural substrate for lexical processing , 2003, Journal of Neurolinguistics.
[50] J A Bashford,et al. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[51] L. Pessoa,et al. Filling-in: From perceptual completion to cortical reorganization. , 2003 .
[52] R M Warren,et al. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.
[53] W. Marslen-Wilson. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.
[54] Christian E Stilp. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] John J. Foxe,et al. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.
[56] C. A. Weaver,et al. Psychology of Reading , 2012 .
[57] Daniel Fogerty. Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[58] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[59] G. Kanizsa,et al. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .
[60] Paul Duchnowski,et al. Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition , 2000, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..
[61] F. Colavita. Human sensory dominance , 1974 .
[62] C. Perfetti,et al. Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. , 1992 .
[63] Montserrat Comesaña,et al. On the role of the upper part of words in lexical access: Evidence with masked priming , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[64] S. Hochstein,et al. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[65] D. Massaro,et al. The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition. , 1979, Acta psychologica.
[66] D. Mauer,et al. " Phonological Awareness , 2012 .
[67] V. Bruce,et al. Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental, and Neuropsychological Perspectives , 1989 .
[68] K. Goodman. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .
[69] Joel R. Meyer,et al. Modality independence of word comprehension , 2002, Human brain mapping.
[70] J. M. Ackroff,et al. Auditory Induction: Perceptual Synthesis of Absent Sounds , 1972, Science.
[71] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[72] A. Zekveld,et al. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[73] Ruth Campbell,et al. The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[74] R. Day,et al. Illusory Contours in Line Patterns with Apparent Depth Due to Either Perspective or Overlay , 1983, Perception.
[75] J C Ziegler,et al. Simulating individual word identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[76] Larry E Humes,et al. Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[77] Louis C. W. Pols,et al. Vowel segments in consonantal contexts: a spectral study of coarticulation. Part I , 1979 .
[78] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .
[79] S. Samuels,et al. Reading and Listening to Expository Text , 1985 .
[80] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[81] Daniel Fogerty,et al. The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[82] S. Hochstein,et al. Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[83] Martin Cooke,et al. Glimpsing speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[84] M. Just,et al. Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. , 2009, Psychology & neuroscience.
[85] Richard M. Warren. Auditory Illusions and Their Relation to Mechanisms Normally Enhancing Accuracy of Perception , 1983 .