The Efficacy of Two Models of Professional Development Mediated by Fidelity on Fourth Grade Student Reading Outcomes

This study addressed the effects of Strategies for Teaching Reading, Information, and Vocabulary Effectively (STRIVE), a distributed professional development (PD) model designed to help teachers implement reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in fourth grade social studies classes. Schools (n = 81 schools, n = 235 teachers, n = 4,757 students) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: researcher-supported PD, school-supported PD, or business as usual (typical instruction). Findings revealed significant effects for both treatment conditions when compared to the business-as-usual condition for content knowledge (g = 0.51 to 0.55), vocabulary learning (g = 0.49) and reading comprehension in content (g = 0.16 to 0.26). Statistically significant effects were not observed for the Gates MacGinitie Reading Comprehension (g = 0.04 to 0.06), however, the effect size for the Gates MacGinitie Vocabulary test was statistically significant for the school-supported PD group (g = 0.03 to 0.07). Findings establish the efficacy of the STRIVE PD model on student reading outcomes and supports the efficacy of using more sustainable methods of PD that feature school supported follow up PD. Fidelity did not mediate any outcomes.

[1]  John Sabatini,et al.  How Much Knowledge Is Too Little? When a Lack of Knowledge Becomes a Barrier to Comprehension , 2019, Psychological science.

[2]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Class Percentage of Students With Reading Difficulties on Content Knowledge and Comprehension , 2019, Journal of learning disabilities.

[3]  R. Savage,et al.  Teacher Professional Development and Student Literacy Growth: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Educational Psychology Review.

[4]  G. Roberts,et al.  Causal Mediation in Educational Intervention Studies , 2018, Behavioral disorders.

[5]  C. Lemons,et al.  Teacher perspectives on intervention sustainability: implications for school leadership , 2018 .

[6]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Effective Teacher Professional Development , 2017 .

[7]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Improving Content Knowledge and Comprehension for English Language Learners: Findings From a Randomized Control Trial , 2017 .

[8]  S. Neugebauer.  Stable or situated understandings of adolescent reading engagement across readers and raters , 2016 .

[9]  Alison G. Boardman,et al.  Relationship Between Implementation of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Student Outcomes for Adolescents With Disabilities , 2016, Journal of learning disabilities.

[10]  Paulina A. Kulesz,et al.  Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12 , 2016 .

[11]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication , 2015 .

[12]  Steven J. Amendum.  Embedded Professional Development and Classroom-Based Early Reading Intervention: Early Diagnostic Reading Intervention Through Coaching , 2014 .

[13]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Examining the Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Reading Comprehension Intervention in Middle Schools: A Focus on Treatment Fidelity , 2014 .

[14]  S. Vaughn,et al.  A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Reading Interventions Using Social Studies Content for Students With Learning Disabilities , 2014, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  Lisa V. McCulley,et al.  Intervention Fidelity in Special and General Education Research Journals , 2013 .

[16]  Alison G. Boardman,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading: Findings From Experienced Implementers , 2013 .

[17]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  Reading Intervention in Middle and High Schools: Implementation Fidelity, Teacher Efficacy, and Student Achievement , 2013 .

[18]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school , 2013 .

[19]  M. Stein,et al.  Supporting Sustainability: Teachers’ Advice Networks and Ambitious Instructional Reform , 2012, American Journal of Education.

[20]  C. Snow,et al.  Professional Development for Reading Achievement , 2012, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[22]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Effect Sizes in Three-Level Cluster-Randomized Experiments , 2011 .

[23]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Examining the Impact of Teacher Quality on Fourth-Grade Students' Comprehension and Content-Area Achievement , 2011 .

[24]  Zsolt Lavicza,et al.  The role of teachers’ orientation to learning in professional development and change: A national study of teachers in England , 2011 .

[25]  M. Ness.  Teachers’ Use of and Attitudes Toward Informational Text in K–5 Classrooms , 2011 .

[26]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[27]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[28]  Carolyn R. Kilday,et al.  Implementation Fidelity of MyTeachingPartner Literacy and Language Activities: Association with Preschoolers' Language and Literacy Growth. , 2010, Early childhood research quarterly.

[29]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  A Comparison of Multiple-Strategy Methods: Effects on Fourth-Grade Students’ General and Content-Specific Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Development , 2010 .

[30]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Correcting a Significance Test for Clustering , 2007 .

[31]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Improving Comprehension of Expository Text in Students With LD , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  Hilde Van Keer,et al.  Comparing two teacher development programs for innovating reading comprehension instruction with regard to teachers' experiences and student outcomes , 2005 .

[33]  Michael D. Coyne,et al.  Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education , 2005 .

[34]  Maria Elena Arguelles,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading , 2004 .

[35]  Janette K. Klingner,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators in Scaling up Research-Based Practices , 2003 .

[36]  Todd W. Busch,et al.  Curriculum‐Based Measurement in the Content Areas: Validity of Vocabulary‐Matching as an Indicator of Performance in Social Studies , 2001 .

[37]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[38]  Gerald G. Duffy.  The Relationship between Explicit Verbal Explanations during Reading Skill Instruction and Student Awareness and Achievement: A Study of Reading Teacher Effects. , 1986 .