Navigating expert skepticism and consumer distrust: Rethinking the barriers to vehicle-to-grid (V2G) in the Nordic region

Abstract Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) refers to a technology that could help make the electricity grid more effective, reduce the cost of ownership of electric vehicles (EVs), and help integrate intermittent renewable energy sources. However, despite these advantages, implementation and even knowledge of the technology is not widespread. In order to explore why, we ask the question: what are the barriers that V2G currently faces? To provide an answer, the authors conducted 227 semi-structured interviews with transportation and electricity experts from 201 institutions across seventeen cities within a market currently experimenting with electric mobility and V2G, the Nordic region. Results show that there is an extensive range of barriers facing V2G, with experts suggesting in total 35 categories of barriers. While the literature espouses substantial benefits of V2G, the experts interviewed generally displayed skepticism of the benefits and necessity of V2G in the Nordics. We categorized the top nine discussed barriers into four clusters. These clusters focused on the experts’ skepticism of the benefits of V2G, consumer acceptance, economic viability, and regulatory structure for V2G participation. We conclude the paper with policy implications and suggestions for future research.

[1]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[2]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy , 2005 .

[3]  Filipe Moura,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid systems for sustainable development: An integrated energy analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G , 2008 .

[5]  Samveg Saxena,et al.  Quantifying electric vehicle battery degradation from driving vs. V2G services , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[6]  Eva Niesten,et al.  How is value created and captured in smart grids? A review of the literature and an analysis of pilot projects , 2016 .

[7]  Samveg Saxena,et al.  Quantifying electric vehicle battery degradation from driving vs. vehicle-to-grid services , 2016 .

[8]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Anticipating PEV buyers’ acceptance of utility controlled charging , 2015 .

[9]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Expert perceptions of low-carbon transitions: investigating the challenges of electricity decarbonisation in the Nordic region , 2018 .

[10]  A. Mariani,et al.  Willingness to pay... What??? , 2014, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[11]  W. Kempton,et al.  Cost minimization of generation, storage, and new loads, comparing costs with and without externalities , 2017 .

[12]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue , 2005 .

[13]  Willett Kempton,et al.  The Future Promise of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Integration: A Sociotechnical Review and Research Agenda , 2017 .

[14]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change , 2017, Social studies of science.

[15]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) electric vehicles and their contract terms , 2014 .

[16]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Beyond emissions and economics: Rethinking the co-benefits of electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) , 2018, Transport Policy.

[17]  Margaret C. Harrell,et al.  Data Collection Methods: Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups , 2009 .

[18]  P. Jaccard Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines , 1901 .

[19]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  The neglected social dimensions to a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition: a critical and systematic review , 2018 .

[20]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use , 2013 .

[21]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Reviewing Nordic transport challenges and climate policy priorities: Expert perceptions of decarbonisation in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden , 2018, Energy.

[22]  Carsten Ambelas Skjøth,et al.  Assessment of health-cost externalities of air pollution at the national level using the EVA model system , 2009 .