Large-Scale Controls of Methanogenesis Inferred from Methane and Gravity Spaceborne Data

Measuring Methanogenesis After carbon dioxide, methane is the second most important greenhouse gas, and an important species in terms of its role in atmospheric chemistry. The sources and sinks of methane, particularly the natural ones, are too poorly quantified, however, even to explain why the decades-long, steady increase of its concentration in the atmosphere was interrupted between 1999 and 2006. Bloom et al. (p. 322) use a combination of satellite data, which indicate water table depth and surface temperature, and atmospheric methane concentrations to determine the location and strength of methane emissions from wetlands, the largest natural global source. The constraints placed on these sources should help to improve predictions of how climate change will affect wet-land emissions of methane. Satellite measurements allow the strength of wetland emissions of methane to be determined. Wetlands are the largest individual source of methane (CH4), but the magnitude and distribution of this source are poorly understood on continental scales. We isolated the wetland and rice paddy contributions to spaceborne CH4 measurements over 2003–2005 using satellite observations of gravity anomalies, a proxy for water-table depth Γ, and surface temperature analyses TS. We find that tropical and higher-latitude CH4 variations are largely described by Γ and TS variations, respectively. Our work suggests that tropical wetlands contribute 52 to 58% of global emissions, with the remainder coming from the extra-tropics, 2% of which is from Arctic latitudes. We estimate a 7% rise in wetland CH4 emissions over 2003–2007, due to warming of mid-latitude and Arctic wetland regions, which we find is consistent with recent changes in atmospheric CH4.

[1]  Reinoud Segers,et al.  Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes , 1998 .

[2]  J. B. Miller,et al.  Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability , 2006, Nature.

[3]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Renewed growth of atmospheric methane , 2008 .

[4]  Yuexin Liu,et al.  Modeling the emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and methane (CH₄) from the terrestrial biosphere to the atmosphere , 1996 .

[5]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[6]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[7]  J. Lerner,et al.  Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle , 1991 .

[8]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data , 2007 .

[9]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  Ultraviolet radiation drives methane emissions from terrestrial plant pectins. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[10]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[11]  T. Oki,et al.  Design of Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP)—A Global River Channel Network , 1998 .

[12]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Tropical methane emissions: A revised view from SCIAMACHY onboard ENVISAT , 2008 .

[13]  D. Etheridge,et al.  Global Atmospheric Sampling Laboratory (GASLAB): supporting and extending the Cape Grim trace gas programs , 1996 .

[14]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Atmospheric methane levels off: Temporary pause or a new steady‐state? , 2003 .

[15]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes , 1999 .

[16]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Pressure broadening in the 2ν 3 band of methane and its implication on atmospheric retrievals , 2008 .

[17]  Elaine Matthews,et al.  Modeling Modern Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands. 1; Model Description and Results , 2001 .

[18]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[19]  Kenneth L. Denman Canada Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry , 2008 .

[20]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Attenuation effect on seasonal basin-scale water storage changes from GRACE time-variable gravity , 2007 .

[21]  S. Godtfredsen,et al.  Ullmann ' s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 2017 .

[22]  John M. Melack,et al.  Regionalization of methane emissions in the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing , 2004 .

[23]  Mingkui Cao,et al.  Global carbon exchange and methane emissions from natural wetlands : Application of a process-based model , 1996 .

[24]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[25]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions , 2004 .

[26]  J. Olivier,et al.  Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: regional trends and spatial distribution of key sources , 2005 .

[27]  Inez Y. Fung,et al.  Methane emission from rice cultivation: Geographic and seasonal distribution of cultivated areas and emissions , 1991 .

[28]  Arlene M. Fiore,et al.  Variability in surface ozone background over the United States: Implications for air quality policy , 2003 .

[29]  T. Christensen,et al.  Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Inez Y. Fung,et al.  Methane emission from natural wetlands: Global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources , 1987 .

[31]  P. Roger,et al.  Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review , 2001 .

[32]  Douglas A. Miller,et al.  A Conterminous United States Multilayer Soil Characteristics Dataset for Regional Climate and Hydrology Modeling , 1998 .

[33]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[34]  John R Evans Resolving methane fluxes. , 2007, The New phytologist.