Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts.

Social comparison processes include the desire to affiliate with others, the desire for information about others, and explicit self-evaluation against others. Previously these types of comparison activity and their corresponding measures have been treated as interchangeable. We present evidence that in certain groups under threat, these comparison activities diverge, with explicit self-evaluation made against a less fortunate target (downward evaluation), but information and affiliation sought out from more fortunate others (upward contacts). These effects occur because downward evaluation and upward contacts appear to serve different needs, the former ameliorating self-esteem and the latter enabling a person to improve his or her situation and simultaneously increase motivation and hope. Implications for the concept, measurement, and theory of social comparison are discussed.

[1]  D. Ruble,et al.  What children say when the teacher is not around: conflicting goals in social comparison and performance assessment in the classroom. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  A. Arrowood Social Comparison Theory: Retrieved from Neglect. , 1978 .

[4]  C. Wortman,et al.  Social Support and the Cancer Patient , 1984, Cancer.

[5]  A. Greeley,et al.  Attitudes toward racial integration. , 1971, Scientific American.

[6]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[7]  Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. , 1977 .

[8]  R. Schulz,et al.  Long-term adjustment to physical disability: the role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[10]  H. Gerard,et al.  Fear and social comparison. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[11]  D. S. Holmes,et al.  Projection as a defense mechanism. , 1978 .

[12]  Y. Rofé,et al.  Stress and affiliation: A utility theory. , 1984 .

[13]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Performance evaluation: On choosing to know the related attributes of others when we know their performance , 1984 .

[14]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Related attributes in the choice of comparison others: It's there, but it isn't all there is , 1982 .

[15]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying the False Consensus Effect , 1984 .

[17]  S. Shoptaw,et al.  Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  J. Kulik,et al.  Effects of preoperative roommate assignment on preoperative anxiety and recovery from coronary-bypass surgery. , 1987, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  I. Rimer The mass media and the cancer patient--some views. , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[20]  G. Affleck,et al.  Downward comparison and coping with serious medical problems. , 1987, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[21]  Gary Marks,et al.  Thinking One's Abilities Are Unique and One's Opinions Are Common , 1984 .

[22]  Kennichi Ohbuchi Negativity Bias , 1982 .

[23]  N. Ackerman THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF PREJUDICE. , 1965, Mental hygiene.

[24]  W. Stephan,et al.  Effects Of Desegregation On Racial Attitudes. , 1978 .

[25]  F. Gibbons Stigma perception: social comparison among mentally retarded persons. , 1985, American journal of mental deficiency.

[26]  B. Depaulo,et al.  New directions in helping , 1983 .

[27]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[28]  Paul B. Sheatsley,et al.  Attitudes toward racial integration. , 1971, Scientific American.

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A negativity bias in interpersonal evaluation , 1982 .

[30]  S. Schachter The Psychology Of Affiliation , 1959 .

[31]  T. Wills Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[32]  T. A. Nosanchuk,et al.  How high is up? Calibrating social comparison in the real world. , 1985 .

[33]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison after success and failure: Biased search for information consistent with a self-serving conclusion , 1985 .

[34]  D. Campbell,et al.  Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. , 1977 .

[35]  J. V. Wood,et al.  It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization , 1983 .

[36]  J. D. Campbell Similarity and uniqueness: the effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison , 1966 .

[38]  A. Arrowood,et al.  Self-evaluation, self-enhancement, and the locus of social comparison☆ , 1966 .

[39]  K. L. Hakmiller,et al.  Threat as a determinant of downward comparison , 1966 .

[40]  J. Pruyn,et al.  Self-help in cancer patients: A review of studies on the effects of contacts between fellow-patients , 1986 .

[41]  J. Singer,et al.  ABILITY AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  J. Crocker,et al.  Depression, social comparison, and the false-consensus effect. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  H. Gerard,et al.  Emotional uncertainty and social comparison. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[44]  J Crocker,et al.  Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: effects of self-esteem and threat. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  E. Molleman,et al.  Social comparison processes among cancer patients. , 1986, The British journal of social psychology.