Family Relationships as Viewed by Parents and Adolescents: A Specification*

Relational data from a representative sample of high school students matched with data from their parents (N = 3,988) are used to examine patterns of dyadic agreement and disagreement in reports of family life. The level of agreement (kappa) is uniformly low regardless of the aspect offamily life being reported on, whether it is reports of concrete behaviors or evaluations of the quality of family relationships. The results replicate previous findings to an unusual degree. A new specification suggested in this analysis is that systematic response biases are limited to reports of the power dimension of family life-parents and children each systematically enlarge the degree of influence they themselves have in the dyad. Conversely, there is no systematic discrepancy between parent and child reports of the degree of closeness in the family.

[1]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[2]  R. Kessler,et al.  The epidemiology of drug use among New York State high school students: Distribution, trends, and change in rates of use. , 1976, American journal of public health.

[3]  Donald H. Granbois,et al.  Equivalence of Family Role Measures Based on Husband and Wife Data. , 1970 .

[4]  K. Tedin The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[5]  D. Heer Husband and Wife Perceptions of Family Power Structure , 1962 .

[6]  W. S. Robinson The statistical measurement of agreement. , 1957 .

[7]  W. Mason,et al.  On the Accuracy of Children's Reports of Family Social Status* , 1973 .

[8]  Lyle E. Larson,et al.  System and Subsystem Perception of Family Roles , 1974 .

[9]  M. Rutter,et al.  The Measurement of Family Activities and Relationships , 1966 .

[10]  R. E. Ward,et al.  Family Influence and Political Socialization in Japan , 1970 .

[11]  R. Hess THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASIC ATTITUDES AND VALUES TOWARD GOVERNMENT AND CITIZENSHIP DURING THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEARS, PART 1. , 1965 .

[12]  James N. Morgan SOME PILOT STUDIES OF COMMUNICATION AND CONSENSUS IN THE FAMILY , 1968 .

[13]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Parental Influences On Adolescent Media Use , 1971 .

[14]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[15]  M. Kohn,et al.  Social Class and the Allocation of Parental Responsibilities , 1960 .

[16]  A. Booth,et al.  Spousal Consensus and its Correlates: A Reassessment. , 1978 .

[17]  G. Summers,et al.  The Adequacy of Student Reports of Parental Ses Characteristics , 1973 .

[18]  R. S. Cohen,et al.  PARENT-CHILD CONSENSUS ON SOCIOECONOMIC DATA OBTAINED FROM SAMPLE SURVEYS , 1972 .

[19]  John A. Ballweg,et al.  HUSBAND-WIFE RESPONSE SIMILARITIES ON EVALUATIVE AND NON-EVALUATIVE SURVEY QUESTIONS , 1969 .

[20]  B. Greenberg Children's Television Behaviors as Perceived by Mother and Child. , 1971 .

[21]  N. W. Bell,et al.  Measuring Power in Families , 1972 .

[22]  N. John The Validity of Children's Reports on Their Parents' Educational Level: A Methodological Note. , 1970 .

[23]  C. Safilios-rothschild,et al.  Family sociology or wives family sociology? A cross-cultural examination of decision-making. , 1969 .

[24]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[25]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Children's Television Viewing: An Examination of Parent-Child Consensus. , 1975 .

[26]  D. Kandel,et al.  Youth in two worlds , 1974 .

[27]  Ronald C. Kessler,et al.  Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis , 1978, Journal of youth and adolescence.