Effects of Engineering Design Process on Science and Mathematics

This work-in-progress research paper contains the findings from a meta-analysis on the effects of using the engineering design process on K–12 students’ science and mathematics achievement. This study uses a meta-analysis methodology to calculate the effect size of the integration of the engineering design process into science and mathematics teaching and learning practices on student’s science and math achievements. A sample of empirical studies published during or after 2018 were included, and data were analyzed using STATA 16 statistical software. Analysis revealed a statistically significant effect size (d = 0.31 [CI= 0.18,0.44]) on students’ science and mathematics achievement. The findings suggest that implementing the engineering design process enhances students’ learning experiences and improves their academic achievement in science and mathematics. The results of this WIP meta-analysis should inform instructional leaders and other education stakeholders concerning the importance of integrating the engineering design process into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics teaching and learning practices.

[1]  Luciana R. Barroso,et al.  Engineering Better Projects , 2013 .

[2]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research , 2008 .

[3]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach , 2013 .

[4]  Camilo Vieira,et al.  Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[5]  U. Sarı,et al.  The Effect of STEM Instruction on Attitude, Career Perception and Career Interest in a Problem-Based Learning Environment and Student Opinions. , 2018 .

[6]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[7]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT) Instructional Devices in STEM Classrooms: Past, Present and Future Directions , 2019, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[8]  Gerald Ardito,et al.  Robotic Cooperative Learning Promotes Student STEM Interest. , 2016 .

[9]  M. M. Capraro,et al.  Motivating Future Engineers: Building Situation Sensing Mars Rover with Elementary School Students , 2019, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[10]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[11]  Linlin Li,et al.  Evaluation of Learning by Making i3 Project: STEM Success for Rural Schools. , 2018 .

[12]  M. M. Capraro,et al.  HOW SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PBL) AFFECTS HIGH, MIDDLE, AND LOW ACHIEVERS DIFFERENTLY: THE IMPACT OF STUDENT FACTORS ON ACHIEVEMENT , 2015 .

[13]  Adem Taşdemir,et al.  The Effects of STEM Training on the Academic Achievement of 4th Graders in Science and Mathematics and Their Views on STEM Training Teachers. , 2018 .

[14]  R. Dohrman,et al.  Children Using Robotics for Engineering, Science, Technology, and Math (CREST-M): The Development and Evaluation of an Engaging Math Curriculum , 2018 .

[15]  Amy Gillespie Rouse,et al.  Third graders' use of writing to facilitate learning of engineering concepts , 2019, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[16]  Chelsea Waugaman,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Integrative STEM Education: Teacher and Administrator Professional Development , 2018, Journal of Technology Education.

[17]  Courtney K. Blackwell,et al.  Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Student Interest in STEM Careers: The Roles of Motivation and Ability Beliefs , 2017 .

[18]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[19]  A. Permanasari,et al.  Profile of Students' Creative Thinking Skills on Quantitative Project-Based Protein Testing Using Local Materials , 2017 .