When investigating national and international transport policies of the last decade, an ever increasing
emphasis on promoting non-motorized transport modes such as walking or cycling can be identified, aiming
at reaching multiple political targets (eg. reducing pollution, increasing health or lowering land
consumption). However, despite substantial financial efforts being put into infrastructural or awarenessraising
activities, achieving the desired modal shift towards active mobility remains a challenge. This is
frequently due to unclear cause and effect patterns between active mode shares and their determinants, which
in turn leads to uncoordinated or highly fragmented initiatives that impede target-oriented planning.
An internationally adopted approach to overcome this problem is applying aggregated statistical models that
explain modal choice involving multiple regression techniques and hypothetical covariates. Still, general
critique against these models points out that important intangible soft factors such as attitudinal
characteristics of the local population or mind-sets and political commitment of decision makers are not duly
reflected. Also, for Austria there is currently no systematic holistic approach to explain spatial variance in
active travel shares on the scale of municipalities.
Hence the main objective of our research is to design a comprehensive macroscopic model-based approach
for the quantitative explanation of modal split shares in active travel modes in Austria. In our approach we
attach great importance to the inclusion of soft factors in order to contribute novel findings on the dynamics
behind active travel. The research outcomes will aid decision makers and planners in their question where
and more specifically, how to effectively invest into active mobility by revealing key soft factors and
intangible determinants of active travel mode shares alongside a broad range of more known, traditional
factors. Based on this evidence-based decision support approach it is possible to simulate impacts of actions
when aiming at locally promoting active travel modes.
[1]
M. Wardman,et al.
Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data
,
2007
.
[2]
C. Vandelanotte,et al.
Psychosocial and Environmental Correlates of Walking, Cycling, Public Transport and Passive Transport to Various Destinations in Flemish Older Adolescents
,
2016,
PloS one.
[3]
V. E. Daniel,et al.
Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?
,
2004
.
[4]
A. Bauman,et al.
Residents' perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study.
,
2005,
Health & place.
[5]
S. Green.
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.
,
1991,
Multivariate behavioral research.
[6]
Luc Int Panis,et al.
Cycle commuting in Belgium: Spatial determinants and ‘re-cycling’ strategies
,
2011
.
[7]
Ma Xiang-lu,et al.
Commuting by Bicycle:An Overview of the Literature
,
2011
.
[8]
Andreas Faludi,et al.
Introducing Evidence-Based Planning
,
2006
.