Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provides excellent visualization of the intracranial vasculature, it has several limitations. Our purpose was to evaluate the ability of helical CT angiography (CTA) to help detect and quantify intracranial stenosis and occlusion compared with DSA and MR angiography (MRA). METHODS Twenty-eight patients underwent CTA, DSA, and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MRA for suspected cerebrovascular lesions. All three studies were performed within a 30-day period. Two readers blinded to prior estimated or calculated stenoses, patient history and clinical information examined 672 vessel segments. Lesions were categorized as normal (0-9%), mild (10-29%), moderate (30-69%), severe (70-99%), or occluded (no flow detected). DSA was the reference standard. Unblinded consensus readings were obtained for all discrepancies. RESULTS A total of 115 diseased vessel segments were identified. After consensus interpretation, CTA revealed higher sensitivity than that of MRA for intracranial stenosis (98% versus 70%, P < .001) and occlusion (100% versus 87%, P = .02). CTA had a higher positive predictive value than that of MRA for both stenosis (93% versus 65%, P < .001) and occlusion (100% versus 59%, P < .001). CTA had a high interoperator reliability. In 6 of 28 patients (21%), all 6 with low-flow states in the posterior circulation, CTA was superior to DSA in detection of vessel patency. CONCLUSION CTA has a higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than MRA and is recommended over TOF MRA for detection of intracranial stenosis and occlusion. CTA has a high interoperator reliability. CTA is superior to DSA in the evaluation of posterior circulation steno-occlusive disease when slow flow is present. CTA results had a significant effect on patient clinical management.

[1]  Michael Schocke,et al.  Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  James Sayre,et al.  Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  [Comparison of the depiction of pancreaticoduodenal arcades and dorsal pancreatic artery, using three-point scale with volume rendering (VR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and shaded surface display (SSD)]. , 2002, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[4]  T. Hirai,et al.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  J. Russell.  Reduction and prevention of the cardiovascular sequelae of the insulin resistance syndrome. , 2001, Current drug targets. Cardiovascular & haematological disorders.

[6]  A. Ferbert,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography findings in 103 patients following vascular events in the posterior circulation; potential and clinical relevance , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[7]  H. Lutsep,et al.  Association of intracranial stenosis with cortical symptoms or signs , 2000, Neurology.

[8]  J. Terry,et al.  Elective stenting of symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  E. Fishman,et al.  CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Ferbert,et al.  Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: double-detector helical CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  J. Dion,et al.  Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Stroke.

[12]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  B S Kuszyk,et al.  CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[14]  G. Fürst,et al.  Factors Influencing Flow‐Induced Signal Loss in MR Angiography: An In Vitro Study , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  E. Fishman,et al.  CT angiography with volume rendering: imaging findings. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  G. Nesbit,et al.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. , 1995, Stroke.

[17]  S. Napel,et al.  Circle of Willis: evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  R. Sacco,et al.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. , 1995, Stroke.

[19]  Bennett Bm.  On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures. , 1972 .

[20]  B. M. Bennett.  On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures. , 1972, Biometrics.

[21]  P. B. Wollschlaeger,et al.  Experience and result with postmortem cerebral angiography performed as routine procedure of the autopsy. , 1967, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.