Yeast kinetochore microtubule dynamics analyzed by high-resolution three-dimensional microscopy.

We have probed single kinetochore microtubule (k-MT) dynamics in budding yeast in the G1 phase of the cell cycle by automated tracking of a green fluorescent protein tag placed proximal to the centromere on chromosome IV and of a green fluorescent protein tag fused to the spindle pole body protein Spc42p. Our method reliably distinguishes between different dynamics in wild-type and mutant strains and under different experimental conditions. Using our methods we established that in budding yeast, unlike in metazoans, chromosomes make dynamic attachments to microtubules in G1. This makes it possible to interpret measurements of centromere tag dynamics as reflecting k-MT dynamics. We have examined the sensitivity of our assay by studying the effect of temperature, exposure to benomyl, and a tubulin mutation on k-MT dynamics. We have found that lowering the temperature and exposing cells to benomyl attenuate k-MT dynamics in a similar manner. We further observe that, in contrast to previous reports, the mutant tub2-150 forms k-MTs that depolymerize faster than wild type. Based on these findings, we propose high-resolution light microscopy of centromere dynamics in G1 yeast cells as a sensitive assay for the regulation of single k-MT dynamics.

[1]  J. Tytell,et al.  Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[2]  S Inoué,et al.  1. EARLY HISTORY: THE DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL , 1995 .

[3]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  V. Guacci,et al.  Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  Patrick Heun,et al.  Long-range compaction and flexibility of interphase chromatin in budding yeast analyzed by high-resolution imaging techniques. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Inoué Motility of Cilia and the Mechanism of Mitosis , 1959 .

[7]  A. Fagen,et al.  Microtubules grow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Information capacity and resolution in an optical system , 1986 .

[9]  A. Hyman,et al.  Reconstitution of Physiological Microtubule Dynamics Using Purified Components , 2001, Science.

[10]  E. Craig,et al.  Mutations of the heat inducible 70 kilodalton genes of yeast confer temperature sensitive growth , 1984, Cell.

[11]  E. Salmon,et al.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  S. Albertini,et al.  Analysis of the six additional chemicals for in vitro assays of the european economic communities' EEC aneuploidy programme using saccharomyces cerevisiae D61.M and the in vitro porcine brain tubulin assembly assay , 1993, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[13]  J. Yates,et al.  Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[15]  E. O'Toole,et al.  The spindle cycle in budding yeast , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  Tuszyński,et al.  A chemical kinetics model for microtubule oscillations , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  C. Deng,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kinesin-related Motor Kar3p Acts at Preanaphase Spindle Poles to Limit the Number and Length of Cytoplasmic Microtubules , 1997, Journal of Cell Biology.

[18]  P. Sorger,et al.  Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super‐resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  C. Robinow,et al.  A FIBER APPARATUS IN THE NUCLEUS OF THE YEAST CELL , 1966, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  J. Fuchs,et al.  Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[21]  P. Sorger,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. , 2003, Genes & development.

[22]  Colin Pask,et al.  Simple optical theory of super-resolution , 1976 .

[23]  Austin J. Peck,et al.  Antimitotic antifungal compound benomyl inhibits brain microtubule polymerization and dynamics and cancer cell proliferation at mitosis, by binding to a novel site in tubulin. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[24]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Chromatin higher-order structure studied by neutron scattering and scanning transmission electron microscopy. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Hyman,et al.  Structure and function of kinetochores in budding yeast. , 1995, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[26]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[27]  Karl-Rudolf Koch,et al.  Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models , 1988 .

[28]  David J Odde,et al.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Budding Yeast Chromosome Structure and Dynamics during Mitosis , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Live Cell Imaging: A Laboratory Manual , 2004 .

[32]  Gerald R. Fink,et al.  Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology , 1993 .

[33]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Quantitative microscopy of green fluorescent protein-labeled yeast. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[34]  J. Pringle,et al.  Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  J. Kilmartin Purification of yeast tubulin by self-assembly in vitro. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[36]  M. Saxton,et al.  Lateral diffusion in an archipelago. Single-particle diffusion. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[37]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Mitosis: a history of division , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  E. Salmon,et al.  Control of microtubule dynamics by Stu2p is essential for spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment in yeast. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[39]  E. Salmon,et al.  The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[40]  Tim Stearns,et al.  Microtubules Orient the Mitotic Spindle in Yeast through Dynein-dependent Interactions with the Cell Cortex , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  F S Fay,et al.  Superresolution three-dimensional images of fluorescence in cells with minimal light exposure. , 1995, Science.

[42]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Observation and quantification of individual microtubule behavior in vivo: microtubule dynamics are cell-type specific , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  M. Saxton Single-particle tracking: the distribution of diffusion coefficients. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[44]  G Danuser,et al.  Super‐resolution microscopy using normal flow decoding and geometric constraints , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[45]  E. O'Toole,et al.  Yeast Bim1p Promotes the G1-specific Dynamics of Microtubules , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  S. Gasser,et al.  Chromosome Dynamics in the Yeast Interphase Nucleus , 2001, Science.

[47]  Claudia J. Bode,et al.  beta-Tubulin C354 mutations that severely decrease microtubule dynamics do not prevent nuclear migration in yeast. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[48]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[49]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[50]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Transient Sister Chromatid Separation and Elastic Deformation of Chromosomes during Mitosis in Budding Yeast , 2000, Cell.

[51]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[52]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion , 1996, Current Biology.

[53]  A. Murray,et al.  Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.

[54]  E D Salmon,et al.  Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Dosage suppressors of a benomyl-dependent tubulin mutant: evidence for a link between microtubule stability and cellular metabolism. , 1996, Genetics.

[56]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Molecular Analysis of Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment in Budding Yeast , 2001, Cell.

[57]  P. Sorger,et al.  Automatic fluorescent tag localization II: improvement in super‐resolution by relative tracking , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[58]  D. Botstein,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Mutations in the β-Tubulin Gene of SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE , 1985 .

[59]  G. D. Francia Resolving Power and Information , 1955 .

[60]  J. Kilmartin,et al.  NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993 .

[61]  J. McIntosh,et al.  High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.