Dynamic Entry and Investment in New Infrastructures: Empirical Evidence from the Fixed Broadband Industry

In the telecommunications industry, the ladder-of-investment approach claims that service-based competition (when entrants lease access to incumbents’ facilities) can serve as a “stepping stone” for facility-based entry (when entrants build their own infrastructures to provide services). In this paper, we build an empirical model that encompasses a complete ladder-of-investment, composed of three rungs: bitstream access, local loop unbundling and new access facilities. Using data from the European Commission’s “Broadband access in the EU” reports covering 15 European member states for 17 semesters, we test the ladder-of-investment hypothesis. We find no empirical support for this hypothesis, that is, for the transition from local loop unbundling to new access infrastructures, and weak empirical support for the transition from bitstream access lines to local loop unbundling. These results are robust when we take into account the migration effect, the number of access rungs, the development of broadband cable, the regulatory performance, and the evolution of local loop unbundling prices.

[1]  M. Bourreau,et al.  'Build or Buy' Strategies in the Local Loop , 2005 .

[2]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  Regulating Private Infrastructure Investment: Optimal Pricing for Access to Essential Facilities , 1998 .

[3]  Fabio M. Manenti,et al.  Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and empirical evidence from the European union , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[4]  The Economics of the Supreme Court's Decision on Forward Looking Costs , 2002 .

[5]  Tommaso M. Valletti,et al.  Access charges and quality choice in competing networks , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[6]  G. Guthrie Regulating Infrastructure: The Impact on Risk and Investment , 2005 .

[7]  Frank Verboven,et al.  Unbundling the Incumbent: Evidence from UK Broadband , 2014 .

[8]  M. Bourreau,et al.  Progressive entry and the incentives to invest in alternative infrastructures , 2010 .

[9]  Martin Cave,et al.  Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment , 2006 .

[10]  Felix Höffler,et al.  Cost and Benefits from Infrastructure Competition. Estimating Welfare Effects from Broadband Access Competition , 2005 .

[11]  Christine Zulehner,et al.  Demand estimation and market definition for broadband Internet services , 2009 .

[12]  R. Blundell,et al.  Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models , 1998 .

[13]  Hal J. Singer,et al.  Do Unbundling Policies Discourage Clec Facilities-Based Investment? , 2003 .

[14]  Marc Bourreau,et al.  A Critical Review of the 'Ladder of Investment' Approach , 2009 .

[15]  C. Cambini,et al.  Broadband investment and regulation: A literature review , 2009 .

[16]  Stephen Bond,et al.  Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice , 2002 .

[17]  Martin Cave,et al.  Snakes and ladders: Unbundling in a next generation world , 2010 .

[18]  J. Hausman,et al.  Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries , 2004 .

[19]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[20]  Pantelis Koutroumpis,et al.  Competition enhancing regulation and diffusion of innovation: the case of broadband networks , 2011 .

[21]  Michal Grajek,et al.  Regulation and Investment in Network Industries: Evidence from European Telecoms , 2012, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Tommaso M. Valletti,et al.  The theory of access pricing and its linkage with investment incentives , 2003 .

[23]  S. Wallsten,et al.  Net Neutrality, Unbundling, and their Effects on International Investment in Next-Generation Networks , 2009 .

[24]  Øystein Foros,et al.  Strategic investments with spillovers, vertical integration and foreclosure in the broadband access market , 2004 .

[25]  Stephen P. King,et al.  Access Holidays and the Timing of Infrastructure Investment , 2002 .

[26]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  Investments and Network Competition , 2003 .

[27]  M. Arellano,et al.  Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models , 1995 .