Detection of apparent restricted diffusion in healthy rat brain at short diffusion times

The application of bipolar diffusion sensitizing gradient pulses to significantly reduce the diffusion time is described. This approach is combined with the rapid U‐FLARE imaging sequence. Three diffusion‐sensitized types of experiments are compared and their suitability for detecting restricted diffusion is discussed. Experiments using a modification of the diffusion weighting by varying the diffusion time between 1.6 and 6.0 ms obtained nonmonoexponential signal attenuation curves from both healthy brains and postmortem. This behavior is indicative of restricted diffusion, but as it is detectable only at short diffusion times, in contrast to a restriction due to impermeable barriers, we have termed this “apparent restriction”.

[1]  J. Ulatowski,et al.  Rapid monitoring of changes in water diffusion coefficients during reversible ischemia in cat and rat brain , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  A. Hamberger,et al.  Cell size distribution in brain suspensions and in fractions enriched with neuronal and glial cells. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[3]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Mechanism of Detection of Acute Cerebral Ischemia in Rats by Diffusion‐Weighted Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 1992, Stroke.

[4]  D. Norris,et al.  On the application of ultra‐fast rare experiments , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  A low flip angle spin-echo technique for producing rapid diffusion weighted MR images. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  J C Gore,et al.  Studies of restricted diffusion in heterogeneous media containing variations in susceptibility , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Pre‐ and postmortem diffusion coefficients in rat neural and muscle tissues , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  H G Lipinski Monte Carlo simulation of extracellular diffusion in brain tissues. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  D G Norris,et al.  Incidence of apparent restricted diffusion in three different models of cerebral infarction. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  H. Weingärtner Self Diffusion in Liquid Water. A Reassessment , 1982 .

[12]  K. Kogure,et al.  The Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow in the Rat , 1975, Stroke.

[13]  R A Knight,et al.  Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat brain measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Stroke.

[14]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[15]  J. Kucharczyk,et al.  Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: Comparison of diffusion‐ and T2‐weighted MRI and spectroscopy , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[17]  Noninvasive determination of regional cerebral blood flow in rats using dynamic imaging with Gd(DTPA) , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  P van Gelderen,et al.  Restricted and anisotropic displacement of water in healthy cat brain and in stroke studied by NMR diffusion imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.