CHARACTERIZATION OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY AND CONE INDEX USING COULTER AND PENETROMETER-TYPE SENSORS

Assessment and management of spatial variability of soil chemical and physical properties (e.g., soil texture, organic matter, salinity, compaction, and nutrient content) are very important for precision farming. With current advances in sensing technology, soil electrical conductivity (EC) mapping is considered the most efficient and inexpensive method that can provide useful information about soil variability within agricultural fields. The objectives of this research study were to determine if Coulter and penetrometer-type EC sensors produce similar descriptions of soil variability, and if EC and cone index (CI) measured using a penetrometer-type sensor are correlated. The spatial variability of apparent EC (ECa) and penetration resistance expressed as CI for soil compaction were investigated with Coulter and penetrometer sensing technologies. The study was conducted in April 2005 at the research farm located near Williston, North Dakota, on a Lihen sandy loam (sandy, mixed, frigid Entic Haplustoll). The ECa and CI values generated by the penetrometer sensor were averaged over a 0- to 30-cm depth for comparison with values measured using the Coulter sensor over the same 0- to 30-cm depth. Classical and spatial statistics were used to evaluate spatial dependency and assess the overall soil variability within the experimental site. The statistical results indicated that the ECa data from both Coulter and penetrometer sensors exhibited similar spatial trends across the field that may be used to characterize the variability of soil for a variety of important physical and chemical properties. The coefficients of variation (CVs) of log-transformed ECa data from Coulter and penetrometer sensors were 11.3% and 18.9%, respectively. The mean difference, Md, of log-transformed ECa measurements between these two devices was also significantly different from zero (Md = 0.44 mS/m; t = 31.5, n = 134; P < 0.01). Soil ECa and CI parameters were spatially distributed and presented strong to medium spatial dependency within the mapped field area. Results from this study indicate the effectiveness of the ECa and CI sensors for identifying spatial variability of soil properties, and thus, the sensors may be useful tools for managing spatial variability in agricultural fields.

[1]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[2]  A. W. Warrick,et al.  13 – Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties in the Field , 1980 .

[3]  A. Konopka,et al.  FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS , 1994 .

[4]  P. C. Robert,et al.  Using an automated penetrometer and soil EC probe to characterize the rooting zone. , 2000 .

[5]  Evaluation of a soil conductivity sensing penetrometer. , 2000 .

[6]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[7]  R. Reese Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[8]  N. Kitchen,et al.  Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[9]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture : Theory , Principles , and Guidelines , 2003 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity , 2003 .

[11]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[12]  James E. Ayars,et al.  Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity , 2003 .

[13]  T. Mueller,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity Map Variability in Limestone Soils Overlain by Loess , 2003 .

[14]  G. W. Buchleiter,et al.  TEMPORAL STABILITY OF SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY IN IRRIGATED SANDY FIELDS IN COLORADO , 2004 .

[15]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[16]  M. A. Akbar,et al.  Soil water estimation using electromagnetic induction , 2005 .

[17]  T. Harrigan,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity as a covariate to improve the efficiency of field experiments , 2005 .

[18]  H. J. Farahani,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF APPARENT SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY VARIABILITY IN IRRIGATED SANDY AND NON-SALINE FIELDS IN COLORADO , 2005 .