Entrepreneurship and the art of tackling technological crises: a strategic real options framework

In this paper, we will answer the question of how companies should change their capabilities and entrepreneurial styles to survive when facing technological uncertainty. While real options analysis has largely been used for valuation purposes, we suggest that thinking in terms of real options is suitable for addressing strategic issues as well. Real options theory helps reveal how entrepreneurs are able to evaluate uncertain and complex future options when coping with drastic technological changes. We propose that our theoretical construction called strategic real options framework is a good supplement to the dynamic capability view, since it involves decision–making patterns such as creating, sensing, scanning, seizing and reconfiguring of real options. The real options connection also opens up new avenues to look at dynamic capability–based view about entrepreneurship and the role of technology intelligence within it. Finally, we provide qualitative empirical support for our framework by means of a case study.

[1]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[2]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  R. Heiner The Origin of Predictable Behavior , 1983 .

[4]  Jon Elster,et al.  Explaining technical change : a case study in the philosophy of science , 1985 .

[5]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[6]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[7]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[10]  B. Kogut Joint Ventures and the Option to Expand and Acquire , 1991 .

[11]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process , 1993 .

[12]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[13]  L. Trigeorgis Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[14]  D. S. Sivia,et al.  Data Analysis , 1996, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[16]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[17]  N. Foss Real Options and the Theory of the Firm , 1998 .

[18]  S. Faraj,et al.  Entrepreneurial Resources, Organizational Choices, and Competitive Outcomes , 1998 .

[19]  Rita Gunther McGrath Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure , 1999 .

[20]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory , 2001 .

[21]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[22]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[23]  Christopher M. Scherpereel,et al.  The option-creating institution: A real options perspective on economic organization: Working paper series--02-04 , 2002 .

[24]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Dynamic capability view in terms of real options , 2002 .

[25]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[26]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[28]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[30]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[31]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management , 2005 .

[32]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[33]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[34]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[35]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[36]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[37]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[38]  Ari Jantunen,et al.  Valuing technological capabilities ? the strategic options perspective , 2008 .

[39]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[40]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[41]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[42]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path , 2009 .

[43]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain , 2010 .

[44]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Real options, resources and transaction costs: advancing the strategic theory of the firm , 2010 .

[45]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[46]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment , 2012 .

[47]  David J. Teece,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action , 2012 .

[48]  Tarik Driouchi,et al.  Real Options in Management and Organizational Strategy: A Review of Decision‐Making and Performance Implications , 2012 .

[49]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Second‐order competences and Schumpeterian rents , 2012 .

[50]  A. Petruzzelli Balancing Exploration and Exploitation , 2012 .

[51]  Coping with uncertainty – exploration, exploitation, and collaboration in R&D , 2013 .

[52]  P. Luukka,et al.  On the profitability of strategic research networks: a simulation model for pharmaceuticals , 2013 .

[53]  Kalevi Kyläheiko In defence of evolutionary explanation: coping with technological change , 2013 .

[54]  Damian Hine,et al.  Deconstructing and reconstructing the capability hierarchy , 2014 .

[55]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.