Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The faceplate of a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display monitor is covered on the vacuum side with a phosphor screen. The different phosphors that can be used for this screen have distinctly different physical properties that can affect the noise properties of the display. Differences in noise affect the signal-to-noise ratio and, hence, may affect diagnostic performance. This study evaluated observer performance and visual search parameters in the detection of pulmonary nodules, comparing two monochrome CRT monitors with different phosphors (P45 and P104) and a color CRT monitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS The receiver operating characteristic paradigm was used to evaluate observer performance with a series of radiographic chest images containing solitary pulmonary nodules. Eye position was recorded as the observers searched the images on each type of monitor. RESULTS Observer performance, as indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared by means of an analysis of variance test, was best for the P45 monitor, next best for the P104 monitor, and worst for the color monitor. All differences were statistically significant. Eye-position parameters were also affected by monitor type. The time required to fixate the lesion and overall search times were longest with the color monitor. CONCLUSION The type of phosphor used in the CRT monitor faceplate can affect diagnostic performance and visual search parameters. Care should be taken in the selection of monitors for use in clinical radiology.

[1]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[2]  D J Anderson,et al.  High-resolution computer display of portable, digital, chest radiographs of adults: suitability for primary interpretation. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics : method, theory, and application , 1985 .

[4]  E A Krupinski,et al.  The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[5]  B. Hemminger,et al.  Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  E Krupinski,et al.  Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation , 1992 .

[9]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  E Krupinski,et al.  Evaluation of a digital camera for acquiring radiographic images for telemedicine applications. , 2000, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[11]  R A Cederberg,et al.  Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[13]  T Liebig,et al.  Shortcomings of low-cost imaging systems for viewing computed radiographs. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[14]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic methodology: a bootstrap analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[15]  M P Capp,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic Evaluation of Computer Display of Adult Portable Chest Radiographs , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[16]  P J Lund,et al.  Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[17]  Gopal Kanji,et al.  100 Statistical Tests , 1994 .

[18]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  The Monochrome Cathode Ray Tube Display and Its Performance , 2000 .

[19]  S Eikenberg,et al.  Comparison of digital dental X-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.