Inquiry on Perceptions and Practices of Built Environment Professionals Regarding Regenerative and Circular Approaches

The circular economy and regenerative design approaches, although still emerging in the built environment, are important pathways to move away from the degenerative business-as-usual practices in the sector. In this paper, we investigate the perception, awareness, and practices of built environment professionals regarding the adoption of a combined regenerative circularity approach for buildings and cities, and if current practices and ‘neighbourhood sustainability assessment’ (NSA) tools should be improved and how. The inquiry was conducted using a convergent mixed methods approach with professionals from around the globe through: (a) online questionnaires which collected 146 responses, and (b) 18 semi-structured interviews which delved further into relevant aspects of the survey. Quantitative and qualitative responses were coded, grouped, and analysed. Results indicate an average awareness of topics with large space for improvement of practices. The main pathways for improvement for NSA tools include performance requirements, aspects of flexibility and adaptability, and engagement and communication, to which are added opportunities and enablers to improve the sector. The authors hope that this study will contribute towards the improvement and design of better tools and practices to support the implementation of regenerative circularity in the built environment sector.

[1]  P. Osmond,et al.  A neighbourhood‐scale conceptual model towards regenerative circularity for the built environment , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[2]  A. Straub,et al.  Digitalization for a Circular Economy in the Building Industry: Multiple-Case Study of Dutch Housing Organizations , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  D. Mulhall,et al.  The Product Circularity Data Sheet—A Standardized Digital Fingerprint for Circular Economy Data about Products , 2022, Energies.

[4]  R. Passaro,et al.  Promoting circular economy transition: A study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders groups , 2021 .

[5]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework , 2021, Sustainability.

[6]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Limitations in assessment methodologies of neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: A literature review , 2021 .

[7]  Mary E. Forsberg,et al.  Implementing Regenerative Standards in Politically Green Nordic Social Welfare States: Can Sweden Adopt the Living Building Challenge? , 2021, Sustainability.

[8]  Roberta Salomone,et al.  A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm , 2020 .

[9]  B. Serrano-Lanzarote,et al.  An Approach to Environmental Criteria in Public Procurement for the Renovation of Buildings in Spain , 2020, Sustainability.

[10]  G. Ulpiani.  On the linkage between urban heat island and urban pollution island: Three-decade literature review towards a conceptual framework , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[11]  L. Bragança,et al.  Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment , 2020 .

[12]  J. Kirchherr,et al.  Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU) , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[13]  P. Osmond,et al.  Developing Low-Carbon Communities with LEED-ND and Climate Tools and Policies in São Paulo, Brazil , 2020 .

[14]  J. Birkeland.  Net-Positive Design and Sustainable Urban Development , 2020 .

[15]  L. Loures,et al.  Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review , 2020 .

[16]  K. Seto,et al.  Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[17]  Marco Pellegrini,et al.  Overcoming the Main Barriers of Circular Economy Implementation through a New Visualization Tool for Circular Business Models , 2019, Sustainability.

[18]  L. Romanovska.  Urban green infrastructure: perspectives on life-cycle thinking for holistic assessments , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[19]  G. Winch,et al.  Regulation and regenerative eco-innovation: the case of extracted materials in the UK , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[20]  Jae Teuk Chin,et al.  Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[21]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Devising Urban Biodiversity Habitat Provision Goals: Ecosystem Services Analysis , 2019, Forests.

[22]  V. Righi,et al.  The Promise of Participation and Decision-Making Power in Citizen Science , 2019 .

[23]  Seungjong Lee,et al.  Neighborhood Physical Environments, Recreational Wellbeing, and Psychological Health , 2019 .

[24]  L. Verhoef,et al.  New Dimensions for Circularity on Campus—Framework for the Application of Circular Principles in Campus Development , 2019, Sustainability.

[25]  N. Saccani,et al.  Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[26]  Amirreza Mahpour.  Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[27]  Katharina Gugerell,et al.  All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance , 2018 .

[28]  D. Hes,et al.  Evaluating the Practice and Outcomes of Applying Regenerative Development to a Large-Scale Project in Victoria, Australia , 2018 .

[29]  Mohamed Osmani,et al.  Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers , 2017 .

[30]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  Understanding Sustainability and the Australian Property Professions , 2017 .

[31]  Pamela Mang,et al.  Regenerative Development: A Framework for Evolving Sustainability , 2016 .

[32]  Mehdi Hosseini,et al.  An urban approach to planetary boundaries , 2016, Ambio.

[33]  Peter Brandon,et al.  An ecological worldview as basis for a regenerative sustainability paradigm for the built environment , 2015 .

[34]  P. Newton,et al.  Critical Connections: The Role of the Built Environment Sector in Delivering Green Cities and a Green Economy , 2015 .

[35]  Peter Munthe-Kaas.  Agonism and co-design of urban spaces , 2015 .

[36]  E. Talen.  Do-it-Yourself Urbanism , 2015 .

[37]  M. Holden,et al.  Crafting New Urban Assemblages and Steering Neighborhood Transition: Actors and Roles in Ecourban Neighborhood Development , 2015 .

[38]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  City futures: exploring urban retrofit and sustainable transitions , 2013 .

[39]  Frank Nevens,et al.  Urban Transition Labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities , 2013 .

[40]  U. Berardi.  Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[41]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Regenerative design, socio-ecological systems and co-evolution , 2013 .

[42]  Catalina Turcu,et al.  Local experiences of urban sustainability: Researching Housing Market Renewal interventions in three English neighbourhoods , 2012 .

[43]  Peter Clegg,et al.  A practitioner's view of the ‘Regenerative Paradigm’ , 2012 .

[44]  Bill Reed,et al.  Designing from place: a regenerative framework and methodology , 2012 .

[45]  Yong Geng,et al.  Survey of officials' awareness on circular economy development in China: Based on municipal and county level , 2010 .

[46]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[47]  Bill Reed,et al.  Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration , 2007 .

[48]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[49]  Interactivity and Game Creation: 9th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2020, Aalborg, Denmark, December 10–11, 2020, Proceedings , 2021, ArtsIT.

[50]  Genevieve Pearthree,et al.  The development, application, and refinement of a Regenerative Development Evaluation Tool and indicators , 2020 .

[51]  Minhua Ma,et al.  Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, Volume II , 2017 .

[52]  Qian Liu,et al.  A survey and analysis on public awareness and performance for promoting circular economy in China: A case study from Tianjin , 2009 .

[53]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .