Investigating Pointing Tasks across Angularly Coupled Display Areas

Pointing tasks are a crucial part of today’s graphical user interfaces. They are well understood for flat displays and most prominently are modeled through Fitts’ Law. For novel displays (e.g., curved displays with multi-purpose areas), however, it remains unclear whether such models for predicting user performance still hold – in particular when pointing is performed across differently oriented areas. To answer this question, we conducted an experiment on an angularly coupled display – the Curve – with two input conditions: direct touch and indirect mouse pointer. Our findings show that the target position affects overall pointing speed and offset in both conditions. However, we also found that Fitts’ Law can in fact still be used to predict performance as on flat displays. Our results help designers to optimize user interfaces on angularly coupled displays when pointing tasks are involved.

[1]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  BendDesk: dragging across the curve , 2010, ITS '10.

[2]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Curve: revisiting the digital desk , 2010, NordiCHI.

[3]  Pierre Wellner The DigitalDesk calculator: tangible manipulation on a desk top display , 1991, UIST '91.

[4]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Perspective cursor: perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments , 2006, CHI.

[6]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Targeting across displayless space , 2008, CHI.

[7]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Copyright 2009 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. 10.1518/107118109X12524443347715 , 2009 .

[8]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[9]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Mouse and touchscreen selection in the upper and lower visual fields , 2004, CHI.

[11]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Horizontal Selection: An Evaluation of a Digital Tabletop Input Device , 2007, AMCIS.

[12]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[13]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks , 1991, CHI.

[15]  Andreas Butz,et al.  How screen transitions influence touch and pointer interaction across angled display arrangements , 2012, CHI.

[16]  Lei Wang,et al.  Understanding flicking on curved surfaces , 2012, CHI.