Aerodynamic efficiency of flapping flight: analysis of a two-stroke model

SUMMARY To seek the simplest efficient flapping wing motions and understand their relation to steady flight, a two-stroke model in the quasi-steady limit was analyzed. It was found that a family of two-stroke flapping motions have aerodynamic efficiency close to, but slightly lower than, the optimal steady flight. These two-stroke motions share two common features: the downstroke is a gliding motion and the upstroke has an angle of attack close to the optimal of the steady flight of the same wing. With the reduced number of parameters, the aerodynamic cost function in the parameter space can be visualized. This was examined for wings of different lift and drag characteristics at Reynolds numbers between 102 and 106. The iso-surfaces of the cost function have a tube-like structure, implying that the solution is insensitive to a specific direction in the parameter space. Related questions in insect flight that motivated this work are discussed.

[1]  H. Glauert.  The elements of aerofoil and airscrew theory , 1926 .

[2]  T. Weis-Fogh,et al.  Biology and physics of locust flight. I. Basic principles in insect flight. A critical review , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[3]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. I. The Quasi-Steady Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  A. R. Ennos.  The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera , 1989 .

[5]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: II. QUASI-STEADY LIFT AND POWER REQUIREMENTS , 1990 .

[6]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The active control of wing rotation by Drosophila. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[8]  M. Dickinson.  UNSTEADY MECHANISMS OF FORCE GENERATION IN AQUATIC AND AERIAL LOCOMOTION , 1996 .

[9]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[10]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  Z. J. Wang.  Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[14]  J. Usherwood,et al.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[16]  Sanjay P Sane,et al.  The aerodynamics of insect flight , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  F. Lehmann.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  The role of drag in insect hovering , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[20]  Gordon J. Berman,et al.  Energy-minimizing kinematics in hovering insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Passive wing pitch reversal in insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.