Mirror-enhanced super-resolution microscopy

Axial excitation confinement beyond the diffraction limit is crucial to the development of next-generation, super-resolution microscopy. STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) nanoscopy offers lateral super-resolution using a donut-beam depletion, but its axial resolution is still over 500 nm. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy is widely used for single-molecule localization, but its ability to detect molecules is limited to within the evanescent field of ~100 nm from the cell attachment surface. We find here that the axial thickness of the point spread function (PSF) during confocal excitation can be easily improved to 110 nm by replacing the microscopy slide with a mirror. The interference of the local electromagnetic field confined the confocal PSF to a 110-nm spot axially, which enables axial super-resolution with all laser-scanning microscopes. Axial sectioning can be obtained with wavelength modulation or by controlling the spacer between the mirror and the specimen. With no additional complexity, the mirror-assisted excitation confinement enhanced the axial resolution six-fold and the lateral resolution two-fold for STED, which together achieved 19-nm resolution to resolve the inner rim of a nuclear pore complex and to discriminate the contents of 120 nm viral filaments. The ability to increase the lateral resolution and decrease the thickness of an axial section using mirror-enhanced STED without increasing the laser power is of great importance for imaging biological specimens, which cannot tolerate high laser power.

[1]  G. Guo,et al.  Subdiffraction optical manipulation of the charge state of nitrogen vacancy center in diamond , 2015, Light: Science & Applications.

[2]  S. Hell.  Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy , 2007, Science.

[3]  N. Daigle,et al.  Nuclear Pore Scaffold Structure Analyzed by Super-Resolution Microscopy and Particle Averaging , 2013, Science.

[4]  S. Hell,et al.  Polar red-emitting rhodamine dyes with reactive groups: synthesis, photophysical properties, and two-color STED nanoscopy applications. , 2014, Chemistry.

[5]  Stefan Jakobs,et al.  Novel red fluorophores with superior performance in STED microscopy , 2012, Optical Nanoscopy.

[6]  Jonathan L. Kirschman,et al.  Combining Single RNA Sensitive Probes with Subdiffraction-Limited and Live-Cell Imaging Enables the Characterization of Virus Dynamics in Cells , 2013, ACS nano.

[7]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[8]  J. Enderlein,et al.  Metal-induced energy transfer for live cell nanoscopy , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[9]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[10]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Theory and practice of scanning optical microscopy , 1984 .

[11]  S.W. HELL,et al.  A compact STED microscope providing 3D nanoscale resolution , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  D. Axelrod.  Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy in Cell Biology , 2001, Traffic.

[13]  B. Chait,et al.  The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2007, Nature.

[14]  Zengbo Wang,et al.  Optical virtual imaging at 50 nm lateral resolution with a white-light nanoscope. , 2011, Nature communications.

[15]  Isotropic superresolution imaging for fluorescence emission difference microscopy. , 2014, Applied optics.

[16]  Alf Honigmann,et al.  Coaligned dual-channel STED nanoscopy and molecular diffusion analysis at 20 nm resolution. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[17]  M. Gu,et al.  Advanced Optical Imaging Theory , 1999 .

[18]  S. Müller,et al.  Structural analysis of the p62 complex, an assembly of O-linked glycoproteins that localizes near the central gated channel of the nuclear pore complex. , 1995, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  C. Kuang,et al.  Generation of a 3D isotropic hollow focal spot for single-objective stimulated emission depletion microscopy , 2012 .

[20]  J. Wrachtrup,et al.  Super-resolution upconversion microscopy of praseodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet nanoparticles , 2011 .

[21]  Agard,et al.  I5M: 3D widefield light microscopy with better than 100 nm axial resolution , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[22]  Daniel L. Farkas,et al.  Enhancement of axial resolution in fluorescence microscopy by standing-wave excitation , 1993, Nature.

[23]  M. Orrit.  Celebrating optical nanoscopy , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[24]  Volker Westphal,et al.  Nanoscale resolution in the focal plane of an optical microscope. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[25]  Hao Xie,et al.  Analytical description of high-aperture STED resolution with 0-2π vortex phase modulation. , 2013, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Satoshi Kawata,et al.  High-resolution confocal microscopy by saturated excitation of fluorescence. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[27]  P. Chaumet,et al.  Isotropic diffraction-limited focusing using a single objective lens. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[28]  Roman Schmidt,et al.  Sample preparation for STED microscopy. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[29]  Tuomas Näreoja,et al.  Axial super-resolution by mirror-reflected stimulated emission depletion microscopy , 2014 .

[30]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Measurement of the 4Pi‐confocal point spread function proves 75 nm axial resolution , 1994 .

[31]  Xu Liu,et al.  From microscopy to nanoscopy via visible light , 2013, Light: Science & Applications.

[32]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  S. Hell,et al.  Spherical nanosized focal spot unravels the interior of cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[34]  S. Hell,et al.  Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating , 2011, Nature Methods.

[35]  Ohad Medalia,et al.  Functional architecture of the nuclear pore complex. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[36]  Charles R. Cantor,et al.  Toward nanometer-scale resolution in fluorescence microscopy using spectral self-interference , 2003 .

[37]  Rahul Roy,et al.  Spatial organization of RNA polymerase II inside a mammalian cell nucleus revealed by reflected light-sheet superresolution microscopy , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Takashige Omatsu,et al.  Formation of a doughnut laser beam for super-resolving microscopy using a phase spatial light modulator , 2004 .

[39]  Yaoyu Cao,et al.  Three-dimensional deep sub-diffraction optical beam lithography with 9 nm feature size , 2013, Nature Communications.

[40]  J. Schnitzbauer,et al.  4Pi fluorescence detection and 3D particle localization with a single objective , 2013, Optics express.

[41]  S. Hell,et al.  Comparison of I5M and 4Pi‐microscopy , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[42]  D. Axelrod.  Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in cell biology. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[43]  G. McConnell,et al.  Standing-wave-excited multiplanar fluorescence in a laser scanning microscope reveals 3D information on red blood cells , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[44]  J. Small,et al.  Spectrally coded optical nanosectioning (SpecON) with biocompatible metal–dielectric-coated substrates , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.