Multiple classification of the force and acceleration signals extracted during multiple machine processes: part 1 intelligent classification from an anomaly perspective

This paper is the first in a two-part work, where the investigation into the characteristics of multiple machine processes is made in order to accurately control them via the frequently used machine centre platform. The two machining processes under investigation are grinding and hole making: for grinding anomalies, grinding burn and chatter and for hole making, drilling, increased tool wear and onset of drill tool malfunction, which is also significant to severe scoring and material dragging. Most researchers usually report on one machining process as opposed to multiple which is less consistent with automated flexible systems where more than one machining process must be catered for. For efficient monitoring of automated multiple manufacturing processes, any unwanted anomalies should be identified and dealt with in a prompt and seamless manner. This first part provides two experimental set-ups (same set-up with tool interchange) to obtain signal signatures for both grinding and drilling phenomena (using the same material). Here, an approach based on neural networks and CARTs is used to reliably detect anomalies for both processes using a single acquisition path, opening the door for control implementation.

[1]  Xun Chen,et al.  Monitoring grinding wheel redress-life using support vector machines , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[2]  Xun Chen,et al.  Grinding Vibration Detection Using a Neural Network , 1996 .

[3]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Control of Machining Processes , 1993 .

[4]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Fuzzy pattern recognition of AE signals for grinding burn , 2005 .

[5]  Hans Kurt Tönshoff,et al.  Process Monitoring in Grinding , 2002 .

[6]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  CONTROL OF MACHINE TOOLS AND MACHINING PROCESSES , 2008 .

[7]  Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury,et al.  Application of acoustic emission sensor to investigate the frequency of tool wear and plastic deformation in tool condition monitoring , 2016 .

[8]  Xun Chen,et al.  Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming , 2009 .

[9]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks , 2005 .

[10]  Genyu Chen,et al.  Study on methods of enhancing the quality, efficiency, and accuracy of pulsed laser profiling , 2016 .

[11]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Rule based optimization for a bulk handling port operations , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[12]  Javier A. Dominguez Caballero,et al.  Tool Condition Monitoring of Ceramic Inserted Tools in High Speed Machining through Image Processing , 2016 .

[13]  Xun Chen,et al.  Real-time simulation of neural network classifications from characteristics emitted by acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[14]  Wojciech Kapłonek,et al.  The Use of Focus-Variation Microscopy for the Assessment of Active Surfaces of a New Generation of Coated Abrasive Tools , 2016 .

[15]  J. Hartigan Statistical theory in clustering , 1985 .

[16]  I. Inasaki,et al.  Grinding Chatter – Origin and Suppression , 2001 .

[17]  Masoud Pour,et al.  Simultaneous application of time series analysis and wavelet transform for determining surface roughness of the ground workpieces , 2016 .

[18]  Bernhard Sick,et al.  ON-LINE AND INDIRECT TOOL WEAR MONITORING IN TURNING WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: A REVIEW OF MORE THAN A DECADE OF RESEARCH , 2002 .

[19]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[20]  Xiaoli Li,et al.  On-line tool condition monitoring system with wavelet fuzzy neural network , 1997, J. Intell. Manuf..

[21]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .