Vulnerability of bridges to scour: insights from an international expert elicitation workshop

Abstract. Scour (localised erosion) during flood events is one of the most significant threats to bridges over rivers and estuaries, and has been the cause of numerous bridge failures, with damaging consequences. Mitigation of the risk of bridges being damaged by scour is therefore important to many infrastructure owners, and is supported by industry guidance. Even after mitigation, some residual risk remains, though its extent is difficult to quantify because of the uncertainties inherent in the prediction of scour and the assessment of the scour risk. This paper summarises findings from an international expert workshop on bridge scour risk assessment that explores uncertainties about the vulnerability of bridges to scour. Two specialised structured elicitation methods were applied to explore the factors that experts in the field consider important when assessing scour risk and to derive pooled expert judgements of bridge failure probabilities that are conditional on a range of assumed scenarios describing flood event severity, bridge and watercourse types and risk mitigation protocols. The experts' judgements broadly align with industry good practice, but indicate significant uncertainty about quantitative estimates of bridge failure probabilities, reflecting the difficulty in assessing the residual risk of failure. The data and findings presented here could provide a useful context for the development of generic scour fragility models and their associated uncertainties.

[1]  R. M. Cooke,et al.  Evaluation of a Performance-Based Expert Elicitation: WHO Global Attribution of Foodborne Diseases , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  Clear-water scour development at bridge abutments , 2003 .

[3]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  SCALE EFFECT IN PIER-SCOUR EXPERIMENTS. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1998 .

[4]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Cross validation for the classical model of structured expert judgment , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  Evaluation of Existing Equations for Local Scour at Bridge Piers , 2014 .

[6]  Matthew Jones,et al.  Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Modelling: A Practitioner's Guide , 2017 .

[7]  B. R. Ellingwood,et al.  Structural reliability and performance-based engineering , 2008 .

[8]  L. W. Zevenbergen,et al.  Comparison of the HEC-18, Melville and Sheppard Pier Scour Equations , 2010 .

[9]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty and Reliability in Bridge Scour Estimations , 2015 .

[10]  Ioannis Ioannou,et al.  Expert judgment-based fragility assessment of reinforced concrete buildings exposed to fire , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Peggy A. Johnson Preliminary Assessment and Rating of Stream Channel Stability near Bridges , 2005 .

[12]  Ben Gouldby,et al.  Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability , 2010 .

[13]  M. Escarameia,et al.  Update of manual on scour at bridges and other hydraulic structures , 2014 .

[14]  L. A. Arneson Evaluating Scour at Bridges , 2013 .

[15]  B. Melville,et al.  Scale Effect in Pier-Scour Experiments , 1998 .

[16]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Fault tree analysis of bridge failure due to scour and channel instability , 1999 .

[17]  Kam Ng,et al.  Geotechnical considerations in hydraulic modeling of bridge abutment scour , 2015 .

[18]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  TU Delft expert judgment data base , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  B. Melville,et al.  TIME SCALE FOR LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS , 2000 .

[20]  Jim Watson,et al.  Governance of interdependent infrastructure provision , 2016 .

[21]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  The future of national infrastructure , 2016 .

[22]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Discrete Choice with Probabilistic Inversion: Application to energy policy choice and wiring failure , 2007 .

[23]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[24]  Wesley Cook,et al.  Bridge Failure Rates, Consequences, and Predictive Trends , 2014 .

[25]  Willy P Aspinall,et al.  An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets , 2013 .

[26]  Lloyd H.C. Chua,et al.  Predicting time-dependent pier scour depth with support vector regression , 2012 .

[27]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards , 2011 .

[28]  Richard Whitehouse,et al.  Scour risk assessment at river crossings , 2012 .

[29]  Susie ElSaadany,et al.  Expert Elicitation for the Judgment of Prion Disease Risk Uncertainties , 2011, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[30]  B. Melville PIER AND ABUTMENT SCOUR: INTEGRATED APPROACH , 1997 .

[31]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Expert Elicitation and Judgement , 2013 .