Making a meaningful contribution to theory

Purpose – The need to make a “theoretical contribution” is a presumed mandate that permeates any researcher’s career in the Social Sciences, yet all too often this remains a source of confusion and frustration. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on, and further develops, the principal themes discussed in the “OM Theory” workshop in Dublin in 2011 and the special sessions at the 2011 and the 2013 EurOMA Conferences in Cambridge and Dublin. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents six short essays that explore the role and use of theory in management research, and specifically ask what is a good or meaningful contribution to theory. The authors comment on the current state of theory in Operations Management (OM) (Harry Boer), the type of theories the authors have in OM (Chris Voss), the role of theory in increasing the general understanding of OM problems (Roger Schmenner), whether the authors can borrow theories from other fields or actually have theory “of our own” (Matthias Holweg), the dif...

[1]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  The operations management research agenda: An update , 1989 .

[2]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  Field research in operations and supply chain management , 2011 .

[3]  H. Kunkel.  GENERAL INTRODUCTION , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  A classification and evaluation of research in operations management , 1980 .

[5]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[6]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Hopes for the future of operations management , 2001 .

[7]  Mahesh Gupta,et al.  Theory of constraints: a theory for operations management , 2008 .

[8]  P. Snowdon,et al.  What is Realism , 2002 .

[9]  Nigel Slack,et al.  Operations management , 1994 .

[10]  J. Hollenbeck.  The Role of Editing in Knowledge Development: Consensus Shifting and Consensus Creation , 2008 .

[11]  R. Coff,et al.  Both Market and Hierarchy: An Incentive-System Theory of Hybrid Governance Forms , 2009 .

[12]  R. Schmenner,et al.  On theory in operations management , 1998 .

[13]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[14]  Gertrude P. Pannirselvam,et al.  Operations management research: an update for the 1990s , 1999 .

[15]  Kevin W Linderman,et al.  The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management , 2010 .

[16]  Elwood Spencer Buffa,et al.  Modern Production Management , 1969 .

[17]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[18]  S. D. Amundson.  Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines , 1998 .

[19]  Christopher A. Voss.  Learning from the first Operations Management textbook , 2007 .

[20]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  Katri Kauppi,et al.  Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research : Review and research suggestions , 2013 .

[22]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .

[23]  Torbjørn H. Netland,et al.  The S‐Curve Effect of Lean Implementation , 2016 .

[24]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[25]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[26]  H. Putnam.  The Many Faces of Realism , 2020, Pragmatism.

[27]  P. Schroeder.  The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement , 1994 .

[28]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[29]  R. Carnap.  Der logische Aufbau der Welt , 1998 .

[30]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[31]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development , 2006 .

[32]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[33]  P. Swamidass.  Empirical Science: New Frontier in Operations Management Research , 1991 .

[34]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[35]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Contingency research in operations management practices , 2008 .

[36]  J. Meredith,et al.  Alternative research paradigms in operations , 1989 .

[37]  Frederick Suppe,et al.  "What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories?" , 1972, Philosophy of Science.

[38]  Linda G. Sprague,et al.  Evolution of the field of operations management , 2007 .

[39]  Milton Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .

[40]  Kaushiki Sanyal,et al.  In Search of a New Theory , 2017 .

[41]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Re-exploring the Relationship Between Flexibility and the External Environment , 2004 .

[42]  Michael Lewis,et al.  The two worlds of operations management research and practice: Can they meet, should they meet? , 2004 .

[43]  D. Morrice,et al.  The “physics” of capacity and backlog management in service and custom manufacturing supply chains , 2005 .

[44]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth , 1978 .

[45]  J. Kingman.  On Queues in Heavy Traffic , 1962 .

[46]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The Politics of Emotion: A Feminist Reading of Bounded Rationality , 1992 .

[47]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[48]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  From Blue Sky Research to Problem Solving: A Philosophy of Science Theory of New Knowledge Production , 2011 .

[49]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Too much theory, not enough understanding , 2009 .

[50]  H. Putnam.  X—What Is “Realism”? , 1976 .

[51]  Brayden G. King,et al.  The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions , 2009 .

[52]  George B. Kleindorfer,et al.  Validation in Simulation: Various Positions in the Philosophy of Science , 1998 .

[53]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[54]  A. Pilkington,et al.  Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM , 2006 .

[55]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[56]  H. Kyburg,et al.  How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[57]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[58]  R. Johnston,et al.  Towards a Classification of Service Processes , 1992 .

[59]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[60]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Theory Building through Conceptual Methods , 1993 .

[61]  E. S. Buffa.  Research in Operations Management , 1980 .

[62]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[63]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices , 2009 .

[64]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  An exploratory study of manufacturing practice and performance interrelationships: Implications for capability progression , 2005 .

[65]  A. J. Ayer,et al.  Language, Truth, and Logic , 1936 .

[66]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[67]  J. Wacker.  A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management , 1998 .

[68]  C. Hempel.  Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[69]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[70]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  The service bullwhip effect , 2013 .

[71]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[72]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM , 1997 .

[73]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .