Automatic cattle muzzle print classification system using multiclass support vector machine

Cattle muzzle classification can be considered as a biometric identifier to maintain the livestock and guarantee the safety of cattle products. This paper presents a muzzle-based classification system using multiclass support vector machines (MSVMs). The proposed MSVMs system consists of three phases; namely preprocessing, feature extraction and classifications. Preprocessing techniques, histogram equalisation and mathematical morphology filtering have been used to increase image contrast and removing noise respectively. The proposed system uses box-counting algorithm for detecting feature of each muzzle image. For a strong classification system and achieving more accurate classification result, MSVMs has been used. The experimental evaluation prove the advancement of the presented system as it achieve 96% classification accuracy in case of increase number of classified group to ten groups compared to 90% classification accuracy achieved by traditional classification system.

[1]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometric recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[2]  J. Samuel Manoharan,et al.  A Survey on the Preprocessing Techniques of Mammogram for the Detection of Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[3]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[4]  K Thangavel. Mammogram Mining with Genetic Optimization of Ant-Miner Parameters , 2009 .

[5]  Christophe Rosenberger,et al.  Fast computation of the performance evaluation of biometric systems: Application to multibiometrics , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[6]  D. Wyld Radio Frequency Identification , 2008 .

[7]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometrics , 2008, ICPR 2008.

[8]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  Agma J. M. Traina,et al.  Fractal analysis of image textures for indexing and retrieval by content , 2005, 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'05).

[10]  W. E. Petersen,et al.  The Identification of the Bovine by Means of Nose-Prints , 1922 .

[11]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  Marc Van Droogenbroeck,et al.  Morphological Erosions and Openings: Fast Algorithms Based on Anchors , 2005, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[13]  John C. Platt,et al.  Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, advances in kernel methods , 1999 .

[14]  Settapong Malisuwan,et al.  A box-counting fractal dimension for feature extraction in iris recognition , 2011, 2011 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems (ISPACS).

[15]  A. Baranov,et al.  Breed differences and intra-breed genetic variability of dermatoglyphic pattern of cattle. , 1993, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[16]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.