Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical data

Quantum machine learning techniques are commonly considered one of the most promising candidates for demonstrating practical quantum advantage. In particular, quantum kernel methods have been demonstrated to be able to learn certain classically intractable functions efficiently if the kernel is well-aligned with the target function. In the more general case, quantum kernels are known to suffer from exponential"flattening"of the spectrum as the number of qubits grows, preventing generalization and necessitating the control of the inductive bias by hyperparameters. We show that the general-purpose hyperparameter tuning techniques proposed to improve the generalization of quantum kernels lead to the kernel becoming well-approximated by a classical kernel, removing the possibility of quantum advantage. We provide extensive numerical evidence for this phenomenon utilizing multiple previously studied quantum feature maps and both synthetic and real data. Our results show that unless novel techniques are developed to control the inductive bias of quantum kernels, they are unlikely to provide a quantum advantage on classical data.

[1]  Tailong Xiao,et al.  Intelligent certification for quantum simulators via machine learning , 2022, npj Quantum Information.

[2]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning , 2022, Nature Computational Science.

[3]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Building spatial symmetries into parameterized quantum circuits for faster training , 2022, Quantum Science and Technology.

[4]  Guihua Zeng,et al.  Parameter estimation in quantum sensing based on deep reinforcement learning , 2022 .

[5]  Jordan S. Cotler,et al.  Quantum advantage in learning from experiments , 2021, Science.

[6]  Jingbo B. Wang,et al.  Quantum Phase Recognition via Quantum Kernel Methods , 2021, Quantum.

[7]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data , 2021, Nature Communications.

[8]  Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup,et al.  Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods , 2021, Nature Communications.

[9]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Equivalence of quantum barren plateaus to cost concentration and narrow gorges , 2021, Quantum Science and Technology.

[10]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits , 2021, Nature Communications.

[11]  H. Neven,et al.  Power of data in quantum machine learning , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  Stefan Woerner,et al.  The power of quantum neural networks , 2020, Nature Computational Science.

[13]  K. Temme,et al.  A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning , 2020, Nature Physics.

[14]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Higher order derivatives of quantum neural networks with barren plateaus , 2020, Quantum Science and Technology.

[15]  C. Pehlevan,et al.  Spectral bias and task-model alignment explain generalization in kernel regression and infinitely wide neural networks , 2020, Nature Communications.

[16]  Daniel K. Park,et al.  The theory of the quantum kernel-based binary classifier , 2020, 2004.03489.

[17]  R. Kueng,et al.  Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements , 2020, Nature Physics.

[18]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  Quantum classifier with tailored quantum kernel , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[19]  Xin Wang,et al.  Transferable control for quantum parameter estimation through reinforcement learning , 2019, 1904.11298.

[20]  Joseph M. Jacob Professionalism , 2018, Doctors & Roles.

[21]  Kristan Temme,et al.  Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces , 2018, Nature.

[22]  Ryan Babbush,et al.  Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum machine learning , 2016, Nature.

[24]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networks , 2016, ICML.

[25]  Yazhen Wang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information , 2012, 1210.0736.

[26]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[27]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[28]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[29]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[30]  Jon Machta,et al.  Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2011 .

[31]  Beyond—bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[32]  S. Kak Information, physics, and computation , 1996 .

[33]  Physical Review Letters 63 , 1989 .