Outdoor performance of CIGS modules at multiple temperatures over three years

The performance and degradation rate of photovoltaic (PV) modules primarily depend on the technology type, module design and field operating conditions. The metastability is a known phenomenon in the CIGS (copper indium gallium diselenide) module technology and it depends on the light exposure and operating temperature. This work aims to understand the metastability influence on the performance of CIGS modules exposed outdoor at three different operating temperatures at a fixed insolation over three years. Two types of CIGS modules from two different manufacturers have been investigated in this study. The three different temperatures were achieved by placing three CIGS modules per manufacturer at three different airgaps on a south facing mock rooftop tilted at 20°. The airgaps were 3”, 1.5” and 0”, and the 0” airgap module was thermally insulated to obtain a higher operating temperature. Throughout the test period over three years, all the modules were maintained at maximum power point using a setup containing optimizers and power resistors. The performance characterizations were carried out before and after exposure using both outdoor natural sunlight and indoor solar simulator. The influence of superstrate type and installation height on the soiling loss have also been investigated.

[1]  Dirk Jordan,et al.  Compendium of photovoltaic degradation rates , 2016 .

[2]  A. Chouder,et al.  Analysis of thin film photovoltaic modules under outdoor long term exposure in semi-arid climate conditions. , 2017 .

[3]  O. S. Sastry,et al.  Performance degradation in field-aged crystalline silicon PV modules in different indian climatic conditions , 2014, 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).

[4]  D. Dirnberger,et al.  Uncertainty in PV Module Measurement---Part II: Verification of Rated Power and Stability Problems , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[5]  B. Striner,et al.  Photovoltaic module performance and degradation as compared in distinct climatic regions , 2012, 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[6]  Dirk C. Jordan,et al.  Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review , 2012 .

[7]  F. Chenlo,et al.  Characterization of thin film PV modules under standard test conditions: Results of indoor and outdoor measurements and the effects of sunlight exposure , 2012 .

[8]  Thomas Reindl,et al.  Performance Degradation of Various PV Module Technologies in Tropical Singapore , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[9]  Degradation rate evaluation of multiple PV technologies from 59,000 modules representing 252,000 modules in four climatic regions of the United States , 2016, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[10]  M. Alonso-Abella,et al.  Degradation analysis of thin film photovoltaic modules under outdoor long term exposure in Spanish continental climate conditions , 2016 .

[11]  Mohammad Hussain Naeem,et al.  Soiling of Photovoltaic Modules: Modelling and Validation of Location-Specific Cleaning Frequency Optimization , 2014 .

[12]  GovindaSamy TamizhMani,et al.  Temperature coefficient of power (Pmax) of field aged PV modules: impact on performance ratio and degradation rate determinations , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Sasiwimon Songtrai,et al.  Field performance and degradation rates of different types of photovoltaic modules: A case study in Thailand , 2016 .

[14]  Manish Kumar,et al.  Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review , 2017 .

[15]  G. Makrides,et al.  Degradation of different photovoltaic technologies under field conditions , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[16]  Shirish A. Pethe,et al.  Long-term performance analysis of copper indium gallium selenide thin-film photovoltaic modules , 2012 .