Role of Operating Conditions in a Pilot Scale Investigation of Hollow Fiber Forward Osmosis Membrane Modules

Although forward osmosis (FO) membranes have shown great promise for many applications, there are few studies attempting to create a systematization of the testing conditions at a pilot scale for FO membrane modules. To address this issue, hollow fiber forward osmosis (HFFO) membrane modules with different performances (water flux and solute rejection) have been investigated at different operating conditions. Various draw and feed flow rates, draw solute types and concentrations, transmembrane pressures, temperatures, and operation modes have been studied using two model feed solutions—deionized water and artificial seawater. The significance of the operational conditions in the FO process was attributed to a dominant role of concentration polarization (CP) effects, where the selected draw solute and draw concentration had the biggest impact on membrane performance due to internal CP. Additionally, the rejection of the HFFO membranes using three model solutes (caffeine, niacin, and urea) were determined under both FO and reverse osmosis (RO) conditions with the same process recovery. FO rejections had an increase of 2% for caffeine, 19% for niacin, and 740% for urea compared to the RO rejections. Overall, this is the first extensive study of commercially available inside-out HFFO membrane modules.

[1]  S. Gras,et al.  A pilot scale study on the concentration of milk and whey by forward osmosis , 2019, Separation and Purification Technology.

[2]  B. Keskinler,et al.  Effect of process parameters on flux for whey concentration with NH3/CO2 in forward osmosis , 2017 .

[3]  Jeffrey R. McCutcheon,et al.  Proper accounting of mass transfer resistances in forward osmosis: Improving the accuracy of model predictions of structural parameter , 2015 .

[4]  S. Phuntsho,et al.  Forward osmosis system analysis for optimum design and operating conditions. , 2018, Water research.

[5]  Ming Xie,et al.  Trace organic contaminant rejection by aquaporin forward osmosis membrane: Transport mechanisms and membrane stability. , 2018, Water research.

[6]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Investigation of pilot-scale 8040 FO membrane module under different operating conditions for brackish water desalination , 2015 .

[7]  Koichi Yamamoto,et al.  Effect of Operating Conditions on Forward Osmosis for Nutrient Rejection Using Magnesium Chloride as a Draw Solution , 2015 .

[8]  S. Phuntsho,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility of recovering phosphorus, nitrogen and water from dilute human urine via forward osmosis. , 2019, Water research.

[9]  Liwei Huang,et al.  FORWARD OSMOSIS , 2013 .

[10]  T. Cath,et al.  Mixed draw solutions for improved forward osmosis performance , 2015 .

[11]  L. Zou,et al.  Using FO as pre-treatment of RO for high scaling potential brackish water: Energy and performance optimisation , 2015 .

[12]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Effects of feed and draw solution temperature and transmembrane temperature difference on the rejection of trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis , 2013 .

[13]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Novel Commercial Aquaporin Flat-sheet Membrane for Forward Osmosis , 2017 .

[14]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[15]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Forward osmosis membrane modular configurations for osmotic dilution of seawater by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis hybrid system. , 2018, Water research.

[16]  Linda Zou,et al.  Effects of working temperature on separation performance, membrane scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis desalination , 2011 .

[17]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Rejection mechanisms for contaminants in polyamide reverse osmosis membranes , 2016 .

[18]  Jung-Hyun Lee,et al.  Fabrication of a pilot scale module of thin film composite hollow fiber membrane for osmotic pressure‐driven processes , 2018 .

[19]  I. Vankelecom,et al.  Chlorine-resistance of reverse osmosis (RO) polyamide membranes , 2017 .

[20]  Yufeng Zhang,et al.  Hypochlorite treatment on thin film composite RO membrane to improve boron removal performance , 2011 .

[21]  P. Sukitpaneenit,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water production. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Lixin Xie,et al.  Influence of Temperature on the Performance of Forward Osmosis Using Ammonium Bicarbonate as Draw Solute , 2018 .

[23]  J. A. Rard,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients and ionic transport coefficients lij of magnesium chloride-water at 25.degree.C , 1984 .

[24]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Making Thin Film Composite Hollow Fiber Forward Osmosis Membranes at the Module Scale Using Commercial Ultrafiltration Membranes , 2017 .

[25]  Mitsuru Higa,et al.  Effect of DS Concentration on the PRO Performance Using a 5-Inch Scale Cellulose Triacetate-Based Hollow Fiber Membrane Module , 2018, Membranes.

[26]  Geoff W. Stevens,et al.  Shell-Side Mass-Transfer Performance in Hollow-Fiber Membrane Contactors , 2010 .

[27]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process , 2012 .

[28]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[29]  A. Jang,et al.  Evaluation of an element-scale plate-type forward osmosis: effect of structural parameters and operational conditions. , 2018 .

[30]  Gwyn T. Williams,et al.  CXXXII.—The chlorination of anilides. Part III. N-chlorination and C-chlorination as simultaneous side reactions , 1928 .

[31]  Minkyu Park,et al.  Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: Effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions , 2011 .

[32]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization , 2012 .

[33]  Kees Roest,et al.  Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. , 2012, Water research.

[35]  A study of mass transfer in hollow-fiber membrane contactors—The effect of fiber packing fraction , 2006 .

[36]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Boron transport through polyamide-based thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2014 .

[37]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  The Critical Need for Increased Selectivity, Not Increased Water Permeability, for Desalination Membranes , 2016 .

[38]  Linda Zou,et al.  A Short Review of Membrane Fouling in Forward Osmosis Processes , 2017, Membranes.

[39]  Y. Levin,et al.  Smoluchowski equation and the colloidal charge reversal. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[40]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Efficiently Combining Water Reuse and Desalination through Forward Osmosis—Reverse Osmosis (FO-RO) Hybrids: A Critical Review , 2016, Membranes.

[41]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Osmotic equilibrium in the forward osmosis process: Modelling, experiments and implications for process performance , 2014 .

[42]  Laura Chekli,et al.  Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis Processes , 2015 .

[43]  Koichi Yamamoto,et al.  Potential of Magnesium Chloride for Nutrient Rejection in Forward Osmosis , 2015 .

[44]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Linda Zou,et al.  Effects of membrane orientation on process performance in forward osmosis applications , 2011 .

[46]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Influence of the process parameters on hollow fiber-forward osmosis membrane performances , 2015 .

[47]  William A. Phillip,et al.  Water recovery and solute rejection in forward osmosis modules: Modeling and bench-scale experiments , 2016 .

[48]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[49]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[50]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[51]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[52]  H. Galal-Gorchev.  Chlorine in Water Disinfection , 1996 .

[53]  J. A. Rard,et al.  The mutual diffusion coefficients of Na2SO4−H2O and MgSO4−H2O at 25°C from Rayleigh interferometry , 1979 .

[54]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Yale constructs forward osmosis desalination pilot plant , 2007 .

[55]  G. Muldowney,et al.  An Overview of Proposed Solute Rejection Mechanisms in Reverse Osmosis , 1987 .

[56]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[57]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Interlamination restrictive effect of carbon nanotubes for graphene oxide forward osmosis membrane via layer by layer assembly , 2019, Applied Surface Science.

[58]  Zhaobo Chen,et al.  Effect of the high cross flow velocity on performance of a pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor for treating antibiotic solvent wastewater. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[59]  Rong Wang,et al.  Application of Hollow Fiber Forward Osmosis Membranes for Produced and Process Water Volume Reduction: An Osmotic Concentration Process. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  L. Nghiem,et al.  Effects of hypochlorite exposure on morphology and trace organic contaminant rejection by NF/RO membranes , 2014 .

[61]  J. Benavente,et al.  Effect of pH on electrokinetic and electrochemical parameters of both sub-layers of composite polyamide/polysulfone membranes☆ , 2002 .

[62]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: Role of solution pH and membrane orientation , 2012 .

[63]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a solar forward osmosis pilot plant by response surface methodology , 2016 .