Comparing Enhancer Action in Cis and in Trans

Studies from diverse systems have shown that distinct interchromosomal interactions are a central component of nuclear organization. In some cases, these interactions allow an enhancer to act in trans, modulating the expression of a gene encoded on a separate chromosome held in close proximity. Despite recent advances in uncovering such phenomena, our understanding of how a regulatory element acts on another chromosome remains incomplete. Here, we describe a transgenic approach to better understand enhancer action in trans in Drosophila melanogaster. Using phiC31-based recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE), we placed transgenes carrying combinations of the simple enhancer GMR, a minimal promoter, and different fluorescent reporters at equivalent positions on homologous chromosomes so that they would pair via the endogenous somatic pairing machinery of Drosophila. Our data demonstrate that the enhancer GMR is capable of activating a promoter in trans and does so in a variegated pattern, suggesting stochastic interactions between the enhancer and the promoter when they are carried on separate chromosomes. Furthermore, we quantitatively assessed the impact of two concurrent promoter targets in cis and in trans to GMR, demonstrating that each promoter is capable of competing for the enhancer’s activity, with the presence of one negatively affecting expression from the other. Finally, the single-cell resolution afforded by our approach allowed us to show that promoters in cis and in trans to GMR can both be activated in the same nucleus, implying that a single enhancer can share its activity between multiple promoter targets carried on separate chromosomes.

[1]  V. Chandler,et al.  Chromatin conversations: mechanisms and implications of paramutation , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  N. Dyson,et al.  E2F and p53 Induce Apoptosis Independently during Drosophila Development but Intersect in the Context of DNA Damage , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[3]  T. Merritt,et al.  Nonclassical Regulation of Transcription: Interchromosomal Interactions at the Malic enzyme Locus of Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Genetics.

[4]  M. Levine,et al.  A Novel cis-Regulatory Element, the PTS, Mediates an Anti-Insulator Activity in the Drosophila Embryo , 1999, Cell.

[5]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  Chromosome crosstalk in three dimensions , 2009, Nature.

[6]  J. Kennison,et al.  Transvection in Drosophila. , 2002, Advances in genetics.

[7]  F. Winston,et al.  Analysis of Transcriptional Activation at a Distance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[8]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Michael S. Becker,et al.  Spatial Organization of the Mouse Genome and Its Role in Recurrent Chromosomal Translocations , 2012, Cell.

[10]  E. Sánchez-Herrero,et al.  Interactions of Drosophila Ultrabithorax regulatory regions with native and foreign promoters. , 1997, Genetics.

[11]  Daryl M. Gohl,et al.  Enhancer Blocking and Transvection at the Drosophila apterous Locus , 2008, Genetics.

[12]  W. Gehring,et al.  Detection in situ of genomic regulatory elements in Drosophila. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Michael Levine,et al.  Promoter-proximal tethering elements regulate enhancer-promoter specificity in the Drosophila Antennapedia complex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Wouter de Laat,et al.  Variegated gene expression caused by cell-specific long-range DNA interactions , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Karl J. Dykema,et al.  Somatic Pairing of Chromosome 19 in Renal Oncocytoma Is Associated with Deregulated ELGN2-Mediated Oxygen-Sensing Response , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[16]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Nonallelic transvection of multiple imprinted loci is organized by the H19 imprinting control region during germline development. , 2009, Genes & development.

[17]  A. Tanay,et al.  Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.

[18]  G. Morata,et al.  Trans regulation in the Ultrabithorax gene of Drosophila: alterations in the promoter enhance transvection. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[19]  A. Dean.  In the loop: long range chromatin interactions and gene regulation. , 2011, Briefings in functional genomics.

[20]  Abby Dernburg,et al.  Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of the Yeast Genome , 2010, Nature.

[22]  I. Duncan,et al.  Transvection in the iab-5,6,7 region of the bithorax complex of Drosophila: homology independent interactions in trans. , 1995, Genetics.

[23]  V. Corces,et al.  Tissue‐specific transcriptional enhancers may act in trans on the gene located in the homologous chromosome: the molecular basis of transvection in Drosophila. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Maeda,et al.  An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  D. Thanos,et al.  Virus Infection Induces NF-κB-Dependent Interchromosomal Associations Mediating Monoallelic IFN-β Gene Expression , 2008, Cell.

[26]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[27]  J. Gibson,et al.  Structural Changes in the Promoter Region Mediate Transvection at the sn-Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Gene of Drosophila melanogaster , 1999, Biochemical Genetics.

[28]  Y. Hérault,et al.  Serial deletions and duplications suggest a mechanism for the collinearity of Hoxd genes in limbs , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Dmitri A. Petrov,et al.  Enhancer Choice in Cis and in Trans in Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Genetics.

[30]  William McGinnis,et al.  Multiplex Detection of RNA Expression in Drosophila Embryos , 2004, Science.

[31]  R. Zawatzky,et al.  Identification of individual interferon-producing cells by in situ hybridization. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Fujioka,et al.  A chromatin insulator mediates transgene homing and very long-range enhancer-promoter communication , 2009, Development.

[33]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Site-Specific Transformation of Drosophila via ϕC31 Integrase-Mediated Cassette Exchange , 2006, Genetics.

[34]  Michele P Calos,et al.  Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. , 2004, Genetics.

[35]  Esther Bae,et al.  A novel promoter-tethering element regulates enhancer-driven gene expression at the bithorax complex in the Drosophila embryo , 2007, Development.

[36]  J. R. Morris,et al.  Core promoter elements can regulate transcription on a separate chromosome in trans. , 1999, Genes & development.

[37]  Chia-Lun Tsai,et al.  Transient Homologous Chromosome Pairing Marks the Onset of X Inactivation , 2006, Science.

[38]  M. Bartkuhn,et al.  Long range chromatin interactions involved in gene regulation. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[39]  G. Rubin,et al.  Glass encodes a site-specific DNA-binding protein that is regulated in response to positional signals in the developing Drosophila eye. , 1991, Genes & development.

[40]  B. McKee.  Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  N. M. Stevens.  A study of the germ cells of certain diptera, with reference to the heterochromosomes and the phenomena of synapsis , 1908 .

[42]  J. Galagan,et al.  RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[43]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  A 5′ element of the chicken β-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila , 1993, Cell.

[44]  J. Strouboulis,et al.  The effect of distance on long-range chromatin interactions. , 1997, Molecular cell.

[45]  D. Hartl,et al.  Transgene Coplacement and high efficiency site-specific recombination with the Cre/loxP system in Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.

[46]  K. White,et al.  The locus elav of Drosophila melanogaster is expressed in neurons at all developmental stages. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[47]  M. Groudine,et al.  Functional and Mechanistic Diversity of Distal Transcription Enhancers , 2011, Cell.

[48]  J. R. Morris,et al.  Two modes of transvection: enhancer action in trans and bypass of a chromatin insulator in cis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  R. Flavell,et al.  Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci , 2005, Nature.

[50]  S. Ho,et al.  Gene splicing by overlap extension: tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction. , 2013, BioTechniques.

[51]  S. Singer,et al.  A 1-kb Bacteriophage Lambda Fragment Functions as an Insulator to Effectively Block Enhancer–Promoter Interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[52]  S. Benzer,et al.  Transvection at the eyes absent gene of Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[53]  Ian W Duncan,et al.  Transvection effects in Drosophila. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[54]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  A Simple Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Method for the Construction of Recombinase-Mediated Cassette Exchange Donor Vectors , 2008, Genetics.

[55]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Polycomb group proteins: repression in 3D. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[56]  Adam Williams,et al.  Interchromosomal association and gene regulation in trans. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[57]  Job Dekker,et al.  Integrating one-dimensional and three-dimensional maps of genomes , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[58]  Roland Eils,et al.  Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  Yuzhong Cheng,et al.  Enhancer-promoter communication at the Drosophila engrailed locus , 2009, Development.

[60]  Jumin Zhou,et al.  The promoter targeting sequence facilitates and restricts a distant enhancer to a single promoter in the Drosophila embryo , 2003, Development.

[61]  M. Levine,et al.  Long-range enhancer–promoter interactions in the Scr-Antp interval of the Drosophila Antennapedia complex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  S. Kain,et al.  Generation of Destabilized Green Fluorescent Protein as a Transcription Reporter* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[63]  E. B. Lewis,et al.  The Theory and Application of a New Method of Detecting Chromosomal Rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster , 1954 .

[64]  M. Levine,et al.  Visualization of trans-homolog enhancer-promoter interactions at the Abd-B Hox locus in the Drosophila embryo. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[65]  J. Micol,et al.  Transvection in the Drosophila Ultrabithorax gene: a Cbx1 mutant allele induces ectopic expression of a normal allele in trans. , 1990, Genetics.