Estimating the non-market benefits of water quality improvement for a case study in Spain: A contingent valuation approach

[1]  H. D. Brunk,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION FOR SAMPLING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION , 1955 .

[2]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[3]  W. V. D. Ven,et al.  The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection , 1981 .

[4]  T. Amemiya QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[5]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[6]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[7]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[8]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Sample Survey Principles and Methods , 1991 .

[9]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality , 1991 .

[10]  J. Cooper Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1993 .

[11]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Closure of "Market Models, Protest Bids, and Outliers in Contingent Valuation" , 1995 .

[12]  T. Brown,et al.  Evaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[13]  M. An,et al.  A Semiparametric Distribution for Willingness to Pay and Statistical Inference with Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data , 2000 .

[14]  R. Carson,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests Since the NOAA Panel , 1997 .

[15]  B. Kriström Spike Models in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[16]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Referendum Models and Economic Values: Theoretical, Intuitive, and Practical Bounds on Willingness to Pay , 1998 .

[17]  Brian Bishop,et al.  Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation , 1999 .

[18]  Testing and Correcting for Sample Selection Bias in Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Studies , 1999 .

[19]  Sample Selection Model for Protest Votes in Contingent Valuation Analyses , 1999 .

[20]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide† , 1999 .

[21]  J. Whitehead “A Practitioner’s Primer on Contingent Valuation,” , 2000 .

[22]  B. Jorgensen,et al.  Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement , 2000 .

[23]  Bruce K. Johnson,et al.  Value of Public Goods from Sports Stadiums: The Cvm Approach , 2000 .

[24]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences , 2001 .

[25]  A. Murphy,et al.  Modelling Winners and Losers in Contingent Valuation of Public Goods: Appropriate Welfare Measures and Econometric Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  S. Yoo,et al.  Application of Sample Selection Model to Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies , 2001 .

[27]  S. Yoo,et al.  Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys , 2002 .

[28]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  On Designing Constructed Markets in Valuation Surveys , 2002 .

[29]  Aurelia Bengochea-Morancho,et al.  A comparison of empirical models used to infer the willingness to pay in contingent valuation , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew Schmitz,et al.  The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation , 2005 .

[31]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP , 2006 .

[32]  N. Hanley,et al.  Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the Water Framework Directive: are benefits transferable? , 2006 .

[33]  D. Kay,et al.  Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non‐market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework Directive , 2006 .

[34]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation , 2006 .

[36]  R. Mendelsohn,et al.  Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology , 2007 .

[37]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis? , 2007 .

[38]  N. Jones,et al.  Economic valuation of coastal water quality and protest responses: A case study in Mitilini, Greece , 2008 .

[39]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs , 2008 .

[40]  Dominic Moran,et al.  The economic value of water use: implications for implementing the Water Framework Directive in Scotland. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  A transferable water quality ladder for conveying use and ecological information within public surveys 1 , 2009 .

[42]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  Accounting for Negative, Zero and Positive Willingness to Pay for Landscape Change in a National Park , 2009 .

[43]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  Water footprint analysis (hydrologic and economic) of the Guadiana river basin , 2009 .

[45]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Valoración económica de los beneficios ambientales de no mercado derivados de la mejora de la calidad del agua: una estimación en aplicación de la Directiva Marco del Agua al Guadalquivir , 2011 .

[46]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment , 2010, Land Economics.

[47]  Julio Berbel,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework Directive. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  D. Liefferink,et al.  The EU Water Framework Directive: A multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact , 2011 .

[49]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Environmental and Resource Costs Under Water Scarcity Conditions: An Estimation in the Context of the European Water Framework Directive , 2011 .

[50]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: Insights for conservation policies , 2011 .

[51]  K. Glenk,et al.  Public preferences for water quality improvements: implications for the implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Scotland , 2011 .