Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Although attempts have been made to treat hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with right ventricular pacing, the usual treatment for those refractory to medical therapy is open heart surgery. To assess in detail the value of non-surgical therapy the effects of acute and long-term dual-chamber pacing were investigated in 13 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy refractory to medical treatment. In the first part of the study, atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing was found to reduce peak subaortic pressure gradient in 12 of the 13 patients, from 82 (SD 42) to 47 (34) mm Hg (p less than 0.002), without concomitantly reducing aortic blood pressure or cardiac output. This effect was related to AV interval. In the second part of the study, a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted in 8 patients and programmed to the optimum AV interval for the individual (50-90 ms). Patients were followed up for up to 62 months. Pacing resulted in a significant and long-lasting reduction in severity of angina pectoris (from NYHA class 3 to 1) and dyspnoea (from NYHA class 3 to 2). Echocardiography showed no significant change in septal thickness or left ventricular contractility but there was a trend to a spontaneous decrease in obstruction. In patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, synchronised and ventricular pacing at optimum AV interval for the individual reduces the intraventricular pressure gradient and improves functional tolerance. Since the effect is longlasting, such pacing should be deemed an alternative therapy to surgery in selected cases.

[1]  A. Labovitz,et al.  The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  C. Tracy,et al.  Differences in coronary flow and myocardial metabolism at rest and during pacing between patients with obstructive and patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  C A Czeisler,et al.  Morning increase in platelet aggregability. Association with assumption of the upright posture. , 1988, Circulation.

[4]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Patterns and significance of distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A wide angle, two dimensional echocardiographic study of 125 patients. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  R. Bonow,et al.  Occurrence and significance of progressive left ventricular wall thinning and relative cavity dilatation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  M. Rothlin,et al.  Beeinflussung der muskulären Subaortenstenose durch intraventrikuläre Reizausbreitung , 1971 .

[7]  H. Rakowski,et al.  Muscular subaortic stenosis: the quantitative relationship between systolic anterior motion and the pressure gradient. , 1984, Circulation.

[8]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Amelioration of Angina Pectoris in Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis with Beta‐Adrenergic Blockade , 1967, Circulation.

[9]  W. Bussmann,et al.  Treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with verapamil , 1980, British heart journal.

[10]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  K. McDonald,et al.  Functional assessment of patients treated with permanent dual chamber pacing as a primary treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 1988, European heart journal.

[12]  R. Bonow,et al.  Atrial systole and left ventricular filling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: effect of verapamil. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Z. Krajcer,et al.  Mitral valve replacement and septal myomectomy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ten-year follow-up in 80 patients. , 1988, Circulation.

[14]  M. Lesch,et al.  Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  B. Maron,et al.  Current operative treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 1988, Circulation.

[16]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Recommendations Regarding Quantitation in M-Mode Echocardiography: Results of a Survey of Echocardiographic Measurements , 1978, Circulation.

[17]  A. Damato,et al.  Ventricular septal motion and left ventriclular dimensions during abnormal ventricular activation. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  W. Williams,et al.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The importance of the site and the extent of hypertrophy. A review. , 1985, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[19]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the atrial contribution to left ventricular filling in patients with DDD pacemakers. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Right ventricular pacing reduces the rate of left ventricular relaxation and filling. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  C. Pollick Disopyramide in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. II. Noninvasive assessment after oral administration. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.