The Effects Of Recruitment Message Specificity On Applicant Attraction To Organizations

We used the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) from marketing research to explain and examine how recruitment message specificity influences job seeker attraction to organizations. Using an experimental design and data from 171 college-level job seekers, the results showed that detailed recruitment messages led to enhanced perceptions of organization attributes and person–organization (P–O) fit. Perceptions of fit were found to mediate the relationship between message specificity and intention to apply to the organization. In addition, perceptions of organization attributes and P–O fit were found to influence intentions to apply under circumstances of explicit recruitment information while attractiveness and fit perceptions were shown to influence application intentions under conditions of implicit recruitment information. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Bruce A. Huhmann,et al.  Rhetorical figures in headings and their effect on text processing: the moderating role of information relevance and text length , 2002 .

[2]  K. Moser,et al.  Recruiting Employees. Individual and Organisational Perspectives , 1998 .

[3]  Howard E. Miller,et al.  Recruiter and Job Influences on Candidates for Employment , 1983 .

[4]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[5]  G. Powell.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO THE INITIAL EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: EXPLORING THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES , 1991 .

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[7]  C. Stevens,et al.  The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. , 2002 .

[8]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Effects of a realistic job preview on job acceptance, job attitudes, and job survival , 1973 .

[9]  Copy length and industrial advertising readership , 1986 .

[10]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  Attitude Toward the Ad As a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: Determinants and Consequences , 1983 .

[11]  N. Mason,et al.  Effectiveness of Specificity in Recruitment Advertising , 1986 .

[12]  T. J. Bergmann,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL RECRUITMENT ACTIVITIES AND APPLICANTs' REACTIONS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS , 1987 .

[13]  Sara L. Rynes,et al.  The Influence of Recruiter Characteristics and Organizational Recruitment Support on Perceived Recruiter Effectiveness: Views from Applicants and Recruiters , 1997 .

[14]  M. Taylor,et al.  Organizational Recruitment: Enhancing the Intersection of Research and Practice , 2000 .

[15]  R. Petty,et al.  Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior , 1995 .

[16]  Joseph G. P. Paolillo,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Image and Specificity of Candidate Qualifications on Response to Recruitment Advertisement , 1982 .

[17]  Organizational choice and decision theory: Effects of employers' literature and selection interview , 1981 .

[18]  Carrie M. Heilman,et al.  The Evolution of Brand Preferences and Choice Behaviors of Consumers New to a Market , 2000 .

[19]  Alison E. Barber,et al.  Job Postings and the Decision to Interview: A Verbal Protocol Analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Industrial and organizational psychology : linking theory with practice , 2000 .

[21]  Michael M. Harris,et al.  A FIELD STUDY OF APPLICANT REACTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES: DOES THE RECRUITER MAKE A DIFFERENCE? , 1987 .

[22]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  APPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION , 1997 .

[23]  J. Breaugh,et al.  Research on Employee Recruitment: So Many Studies, So Many Remaining Questions , 2000 .

[24]  S. Rynes,et al.  The Importance of Recruitment in Job Choice: A Different Way of Looking , 2006 .

[25]  D. Aaker.  Managing brand equity : capitalizing on the value of a brand name , 1992 .

[26]  O. Behling,et al.  The Herzberg Controversy: A Critical Reappraisal , 1968 .

[27]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis. , 1985 .

[28]  Victor R. Tom.  The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process , 1971 .

[29]  Gary N. Powell,et al.  Effects of Job Attributes and Recruiting Practices on Applicant Decisions: A Comparison. , 1984 .

[30]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment , 2001 .

[31]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Argumentation: across the lines of discipline. , 1987 .

[32]  Sonia M. Goltz,et al.  Recruiter friendliness and attraction to the job: The mediating role of inferences about the organization. , 1995 .

[33]  T. Judge,et al.  PAY PREFERENCES AND JOB SEARCH DECISIONS: A PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[34]  Michael G. Aamodt,et al.  The relationship between advertisement variables and applicant responses to newspaper recruitment advertisements , 1991 .

[35]  S. Rynes.  Recruitment, Job Choice, and Post-Hire Consequences: A Call For New Research Directions , 1989 .

[36]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[37]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Mary A. Gowan,et al.  Corporate Image, Recruitment Image And Initial Job Choice Decisions , 1993 .