Epistemic Trust and Social Location

ABSTRACT Epistemic trustworthiness is defined as a complex character state that supervenes on a relation between first- and second-order beliefs, including beliefs about others as epistemic agents. In contexts shaped by unjust power relations, its second-order components create a mutually supporting link between a deficiency in epistemic character and unjust epistemic exclusion on the basis of group membership. In this way, a deficiency in the virtue of epistemic trustworthiness plays into social/epistemic interactions that perpetuate social injustice. Overcoming that deficiency and, along with it, normalized practices of epistemic exclusion, requires developing a self-critical perspective on the partial, socially-located character of one's perspective and the consequent epistemic value of inclusiveness.

[1]  Merrill B. Hintikka,et al.  Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science , 2006 .

[2]  L. Zagzebski Virtues of the mind: A theory of virtue and vice , 1996 .

[3]  Kathryn Denning Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology , 2003, European Journal of Archaeology.

[4]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Pathways to Knowledge , 2002 .

[5]  S. Gilbert,et al.  The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology , 1988, Hypatia.

[6]  H. Longino Science as Social Knowledge , 1990 .

[7]  Ruth Hubbard,et al.  The politics of women's biology , 1990 .

[8]  Anne Fausto-Sterling,et al.  Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men , 1987 .

[9]  Alison Wylie,et al.  Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology , 2002 .

[10]  N. Hartsock The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism , 2019, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays.

[11]  S. Harding,et al.  Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology , 2003 .

[12]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[13]  Uma Narayan Working Together Across Difference: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice , 1988, Hypatia.

[14]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science , 1983, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[15]  D. Davidson A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge , 2001 .

[16]  Patricia Hill Collins,et al.  Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought , 1986 .

[17]  M. Fricker Epistemic Justice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing , 2003 .

[18]  D. Pritchard,et al.  Moral and Epistemic Virtues , 2003 .

[19]  Ruth Bleier,et al.  Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women , 1984 .

[20]  S. Harding Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology : What is « Strong Objectivity? » , 1992 .

[21]  Emily Martin,et al.  The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles , 1991, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[22]  Evelyn Fox Keller,et al.  Feminism and Science , 1982, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.