Pore geometry and transport properties of Fontainebleau sandstone

Abstract Quantitative characterization of pore geometry using laser scanning confocal microscopy and measurements of permeability, resistivity, and pore volume were performed on four samples of Fontainebleau sandstone with effective porosities ranging from 4% to 20% at confining pressures up to 70 MPa. Observed bench permeabilities and hydraulic radii for samples with porosities of 10%, 16%, and 20% agree well with those predicted using the equivalent channel model of Walsh and Brace [1]; however, there is more than an order of magnitude over estimation for a sample with a porosity of 4%. The relative pressure dependence of permeability and formation factor for this sample differs from that of the three more porous samples. We interpret the behavior to result from fundamental differences in the topology and geometry of pore space at low porosity. Comparison of our data with results in the literature for rocks synthesized by hot isostatic pressing suggests that the mechanism by which porosity reduction occurs strongly affects the pore geometry and transport properties of sedimentary rocks.

[1]  Y. Bernabé Pore geometry and pressure dependence of the transport properties in sandstones , 1991 .

[2]  D. Yale Recent advances in rock physics , 1985 .

[3]  Brian Evans,et al.  Permeability, porosity and pore geometry of hot-pressed calcite , 1982 .

[4]  Y. Bernabé Pore volume and transport properties changes during pressure cycling of several crystalline rocks , 1986 .

[5]  F. Dullien Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure , 1979 .

[6]  A. H. Thompson,et al.  The microgeometry and transport properties of sedimentary rock , 1987 .

[7]  T. Madden,et al.  Microcrack connectivity in rocks: A renormalization group approach to the critical phenomena of conduction and failure in crystalline rocks , 1983 .

[8]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock , 1984 .

[9]  P. Doyen,et al.  Permeability, conductivity, and pore geometry of sandstone , 1988 .

[10]  D. Yale,et al.  Network modelling of flow, storage and deformation in porous rocks , 1984 .

[11]  W. F. Brace,et al.  Permeability from resistivity and pore shape , 1977 .

[12]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Transport of fluid and electric current through a single fracture , 1989 .

[13]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Use of digital image analysis to estimate fluid permeability of porous materials: Application of two-point correlation functions , 1986 .

[14]  M. Paterson,et al.  Porosity and permeability evolution during hot isostatic pressing of calcite aggregates , 1994 .

[15]  B. Zinszner,et al.  Hydraulic and acoustic properties as a function of porosity in Fontainebleau Sandstone , 1985 .

[16]  Y. Bernabé Comparison of the effective pressure law for permeability and resistivity formation factor in Chelmsford granite , 1988 .

[17]  M. Darot,et al.  Permeability And Conductivity of Sandstones , 1989 .

[18]  C. David,et al.  Geometry of flow paths for fluid transport in rocks , 1993 .