Noise-induced absorbing phase transition in a model of opinion formation

Abstract In this work we study a 3-state (+1, −1, 0) opinion model in the presence of noise and disorder. We consider pairwise competitive interactions, with a fraction p of those interactions being negative (disorder). Moreover, there is a noise q that represents the probability of an individual spontaneously change his opinion to the neutral state. Our aim is to study how the increase/decrease of the fraction of neutral agents affects the critical behavior of the system and the evolution of opinions. We derive analytical expressions for the order parameter of the model, as well as for the stationary fraction of each opinion, and we show that there are distinct phase transitions. One is the usual ferro–paramagnetic transition, that is in the Ising universality class. In addition, there are para-absorbing and ferro-absorbing transitions, presenting the directed percolation universality class. Our results are complemented by numerical simulations.

[1]  Marco Lisi.  O voto dos indecisos nas democracias recentes: um estudo comparado** , 2010 .

[2]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[3]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution , 2000, cond-mat/0004256.

[4]  S. Lübeck,et al.  UNIVERSAL SCALING BEHAVIOR OF NON-EQUILIBRIUM PHASE TRANSITIONS , 2004 .

[5]  E. Ben-Naim.  Opinion dynamics: Rise and fall of political parties , 2004, cond-mat/0411427.

[6]  M. C. Giménez,et al.  Range of interaction in an opinion evolution model of ideological self-positioning: Contagion, hesitance and polarization , 2016 .

[7]  P. Balenzuela,et al.  The Undecided Have the Key: Interaction-Driven Opinion Dynamics in a Three State Model , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[10]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Sociophysics: An Introduction , 2014 .

[11]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Kinetic exchange models for income and wealth distributions , 2007, 0709.1543.

[12]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  A. Damasio.  Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[14]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[15]  S. Galam.  From 2000 Bush–Gore to 2006 Italian elections: voting at fifty-fifty and the contrarian effect , 2007, physics/0703095.

[16]  Yue Wu,et al.  Exploring the spiral of silence in adjustable social networks , 2015 .

[17]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Pareto Law in a Kinetic Model of Market with Random Saving Propensity , 2004 .

[18]  H. Hinrichsen.  Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states , 2000, cond-mat/0001070.

[19]  Celia Anteneodo,et al.  Impact of contrarians and intransigents in a kinetic model of opinion dynamics , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  R. Dickman,et al.  Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models , 1999 .

[21]  R. Kaul,et al.  Quality and quantity: mucosal CD4+ T cells and HIV susceptibility. , 2012, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[22]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Nonlinear q-voter model. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Anirban Chakraborti,et al.  Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Langevin description of critical phenomena with two symmetric absorbing states. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[25]  S. Galam.  Sociophysics: A Physicist's Modeling of Psycho-political Phenomena , 2012 .

[26]  A. Svenkeson,et al.  Reaching Consensus by Allowing Moments of Indecision , 2015, Scientific reports.

[27]  Soumyajyoti Biswas,et al.  Disorder induced phase transition in kinetic models of opinion dynamics , 2011, 1102.0902.

[28]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[29]  N. Crokidakis.  Nonequilibrium phase transitions and tricriticality in a three-dimensional lattice system with random-field competing kinetics. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[31]  Serge Galam,et al.  Fragmentation versus stability in bimodal coalitions , 1996 .

[32]  Lluís Orriols,et al.  The role of the political context in voting indecision , 2014 .

[33]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[34]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[35]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[36]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[37]  S. Galam.  Minority opinion spreading in random geometry , 2002, cond-mat/0203553.

[38]  Nuno Crokidakis,et al.  Competition Among Reputations in the 2D Sznajd Model: Spontaneous Emergence of Democratic States , 2011, ArXiv.

[39]  Parongama Sen.  Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Soumyajyoti Biswas,et al.  On mean field solutions of kinetic exchange opinion models , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Yun Liu,et al.  Competition of Dynamic Self-Confidence and Inhomogeneous Individual Influence in Voter Models , 2013, Entropy.

[42]  M. J. Oliveira,et al.  Isotropic majority-vote model on a square lattice , 1992 .

[43]  Yun Liu,et al.  A novel opinion dynamics model based on expanded observation ranges and individuals’ social influences in social networks , 2014 .

[44]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[45]  D. Stauffer.  Biology, Sociology, Geology by Computational Physicists , 2012 .