Integrating New Technologies into Fisheries Science: The Application of Geographic Information Systems

Abstract Geographic information systems (GIS) is a powerful tool capable of organizing, analyzing, and displaying spatially explicit data, yet it is not being extensively used in fisheries science. GIS offers advantages over conventional approaches because of the speed and accuracy with which it handles large spatial datasets. Decision makers can then make more informed decisions because multiple scenarios can be evaluated or spatial analyses conducted that would otherwise prove too cumbersome. GIS disadvantages include additional training for personnel, the costs of capital outlay, and the time required to initially assemble a GIS. A GIS database can be assembled from existing digital files, published maps, or using global positioning receivers. Continuing software and hardware advancements have led to greater affordability and user-friendliness. Here, we provide examples of GIS utility in fisheries science.

[1]  S. Kalkhoff.  Using a Geographic Information System to determine the relation between stream quality and geology in the Roberts Creek watershed, Clayton County, Iowa , 1993 .

[2]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  PRACTICAL HANDBOOK of Spatial Statistics , 1998 .

[3]  G. Kennedy,et al.  The distribution of salmonids in upland streams in relation to depth and gradient , 1982 .

[4]  Carolyn T. Hunsaker,et al.  Hierarchical Approaches to the Study of Water Quality in RiversSpatial scale and terrestrial processes are important in developing models to translate research results to management practices , 1995 .

[5]  W. Hubert,et al.  Quantitative Relations of Physical Habitat Features to Channel Slope and Discharge in Unaltered Mountain Streams , 1993 .

[6]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  The ABCs of GIS , 1992, Journal of Forestry.

[7]  C. N. Slobodchikoff,et al.  A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems , 1984 .

[8]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Trout Distribution and Habitat in Relation to Geology and Geomorphology in the North Fork Humboldt River Drainage, Northeastern Nevada , 1992 .

[9]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Managing Geographic Information Systems , 1994 .

[10]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[11]  F. Rahel,et al.  Potential habitat loss and population fragmentation for cold water fish in the North Platte River drainage of the Rocky Mountains : Response to climate warming , 1996 .

[12]  J. F. Novotny,et al.  Spring and Summer Water Levels in a Missouri River Reservoir: Effects on Age-0 Fish and Zooplankton , 1981 .

[13]  Paul Beier,et al.  Determining Minimum Habitat Areas and Habitat Corridors for Cougars , 1993 .