Pattern recognition in the automatic inspection of aluminium castings

∑ Image Formation: The images are obtained by X-ray irradiation of the test-piece. The X-rays are then converted to a visible image by means of an image amplifier or a flat-panel detector that are sensitive to X-rays. The sensor is bi-dimensional (or unidimensional in motion) in order to capture the two dimensions of the image. An A/D converter turns the electrical signal into binary code that can be interpreted by a computer to form a digital image of the study object. ∑ Pre-processing: This stage is devoted to improving the quality of the image in order to better recognise flaws. Some of the techniques used in this stage are elimination of noise by means of digital filters or integration, improvement of contrast, and restoration. ∑ Segmentation: The segmentation process divides the digital image into disjoint regions with the purpose of separating the parts of interest from the rest of the scene. Over the last few decades, diverse segmentation techniques have been developed. These can largely be divided into three groups: pixel, edge and region orientated techniques. The present investigation uses the segmentation process oriented towards the detection of edges by employing the LoG filter (Mery and Filbert, 2002b). As can be seen in Figure 2, this technique searches for changes in the grey values of the image (edges), thus identifying zones delimited by edges that indicate flaws. ∑ Feature extraction: In the inspection of cast pieces, segmentation detects regions that are denominated as ‘hypothetical defects’, which may be flaws or structural features of the object. Subsequently the feature extraction is centred principally around

[1]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Domingo Mery Crossing Line Profile: A New Approach to Detecting Defects in Aluminium Die Castings , 2003, SCIA.

[4]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[5]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[6]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Dieter Filbert,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF POTENTIAL DEFECTS IN THE AUTOMATIC INSPECTION OF ALUMINIUM CASTINGS USING STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNITION , 2002 .

[8]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[9]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[10]  Per-Erik Danielson A new shape factor , 1978 .

[11]  Manfred Schmutz,et al.  Neuronal networks for pattern recognition , 1990, Other Conferences.

[12]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[13]  Luis Volnei Sudati Sagrilo,et al.  Evaluation of the relevant characteristic parameters of welding defects and probability of correct classification using linear classifiers , 2002 .

[14]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[15]  Marcio H. S. Siqueira,et al.  PATTERNS NONLINEAR CLASSIFIERS OF WELD DEFECTS IN INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHIES , 2003 .

[16]  Dieter Filbert,et al.  Automated flaw detection in aluminum castings based on the tracking of potential defects in a radioscopic image sequence , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..