Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode

A new slim modiolar electrode (CI532/632) has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than conventional electrodes. Better modiolar proximity has been proposed to yield better electrode discrimination capability and potentially better speech outcomes, necessitating its efficient measurement. Currently, intracochlear positional index (ICPI), the most reliable indicator for evaluating modiolar proximity, has been measured exclusively through ‘metal artifact-less’ cone beam CT. However, popular use of this index is precluded due to lack of cone beam CT in many institutions. Thus, eyes are now on elucidation of easy-to-measure indicators of modiolar proximity derived from conventional CT, which is accessible in all centers. We observed that enhanced tomographic resolution significantly reduces partial volume artifacts, providing better visualization of modiolus-electrode distance. Aided by ultra-high kernel specification with high-resolution index, we developed a novel and easy-to-measure, conventional CT-specific indicator, “modified ICPI”, for evaluation of modiolar proximity. Further, we showed that it closely correlates with the previously proposed parameter of modiolar proximity, the spiral diameter, measured from post-insertion radiograph, reiterating the value of X-ray-based spiral diameter. Through this study, we have taken a step toward the stage of immediate visual feedback regarding modiolar proximity and changes in insertion technique intraoperatively, ensuring optimal modiolar proximity.

[1]  Sharmila Patel,et al.  Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK , 2019, Cochlear implants international.

[2]  A. Ernst,et al.  Electrophysiological Detection of Intracochlear Scalar Changing Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes: A Blinded Study , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  S. Schmerber,et al.  Scalar Localization by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of Cochlear Implant Carriers: A Comparative Study Between Straight and Periomodiolar Precurved Electrode Arrays , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Irfan Durmo,et al.  Evaluation of Intracochlear Position of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array, by Using Different Radiological Analyses. , 2019, Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[6]  D. Kallogjeri,et al.  Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array , 2020, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  C. Buchman,et al.  Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array. , 2018, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  Martin Eklöf,et al.  Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials , 2019, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  Á. Ramos-Macías,et al.  Hearing Preservation with the Slim Modiolar Electrode Nucleus CI532® Cochlear Implant: A Preliminary Experience , 2018, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  H. Löppönen,et al.  A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  A. Huarte,et al.  Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes , 2019, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[14]  J. Roland,et al.  Surgical Experience and Early Outcomes With a Slim Perimodiolar Electrode. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  C. Bester,et al.  Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[17]  Jae-Jin Song,et al.  Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes. , 2020, Ear and hearing.

[18]  Á. Ramos de Miguel,et al.  Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays , 2018, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[19]  T. Struffert,et al.  Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  R. Briggs,et al.  Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode: Melbourne Experience and Comparison With the Contour Perimodiolar Electrode. , 2020, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[21]  D. Zeitler,et al.  Flat-panel computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography to evaluate cochlear implant positioning , 2011, Cochlear implants international.

[22]  J. Hornung,et al.  Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode , 2017, Audiology and Neurotology.

[23]  Robert T. Dwyer,et al.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Ádám Perényi,et al.  Az emberi halántékcsontnak a csecsemő- és kisgyermekkori cochlearis implantáció szempontjából kiemelkedően fontos dimenziói. Klinikoradiológiai vizsgálat , 2019, Orvosi Hetilap.

[25]  P. van Dijk,et al.  Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: A neural response telemetry study , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  B. Choi,et al.  Appropriate Imaging Modality for the Etiologic Diagnosis of Congenital Single-Sided Deafness in Children , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[27]  Robert T. Dwyer,et al.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using a Precurved Electrode Array Inserted With an External Sheath. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[28]  Helge Rask-Andersen,et al.  Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[29]  E. Ferrary,et al.  Intraoperative Conebeam CT for Assessment of Intracochlear Positioning of Electrode Arrays in Adult Recipients of Cochlear Implants , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  H. Sudhoff,et al.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode , 2019, Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie.

[31]  J. Hornung,et al.  Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode , 2018, Cochlear implants international.

[32]  K Harada,et al.  Reduction of dental metallic artefacts in CT: value of a newly developed algorithm for metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[33]  Comparison of Skull Radiograph and Computed Tomography Measurements of Cochlear Implant Insertion Angles. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  D. Cuda,et al.  Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience , 2017, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[35]  J. Firszt,et al.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[36]  J. Noble,et al.  Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[37]  G. Sprinzl,et al.  Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics – a retrospective comparison study , 2019, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[38]  A. Ernst,et al.  Electrophysiological Detection of Scalar-Changing Perimodiolar Cochlear Electrode Arrays: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study , 2015, Audiology and Neurotology.