Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry

[1]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[2]  R. Merton.  The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. , 1968, Science.

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[4]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Stratification in American Science , 1970 .

[5]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[6]  G. Becker.  Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[7]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[8]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[9]  Darrell R. Lewis,et al.  Faculty Consulting: Responsibility or Promiscuity? , 1984 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[11]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Wages, Separations, and Job Tenure: On-the-Job Specific Training or Matching? , 1988, Journal of Labor Economics.

[12]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[13]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY , 1990 .

[15]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities , 1990 .

[16]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[17]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[18]  K. Pavitt.  What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[19]  M. Schultz,et al.  Informal Collaboration in R & D. The formation of Networks Across Organizations , 1993 .

[20]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  The roles of science in technological innovation , 1993 .

[21]  J. D. Roessner,et al.  What companies want from the federal labs , 1993 .

[22]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[23]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[24]  K. Tornquist,et al.  Out of the Ivory Tower: Characteristics of Institutions Meeting the Research Needs of Industry. , 1994 .

[25]  Jacqueline Senker,et al.  Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies , 1994 .

[26]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[27]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Industry–university technology cooperation: a theory of inter-organizational relationships , 1995 .

[28]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[29]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[30]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[31]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[33]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[34]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  B. McKelvey.  Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science , 1997 .

[36]  David F. Channell.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[37]  Michael Gibbons.  Changing Patterns of University – Industry Relations , 2000 .

[38]  John T. Scott,et al.  Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program , 2000 .

[39]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[40]  Teresa R. Behrens,et al.  Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .

[41]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  University-Industry Cooperation in the Context of the European Framework Programmes , 2001 .

[42]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[43]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[45]  Tom Coupé,et al.  Science Is Golden: Academic R&D and University Patents , 2003 .

[46]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[47]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[48]  S. McGuinness.  University quality and labour market outcomes , 2003 .

[49]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[50]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Objectives , Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations : Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle , 2003 .

[51]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[52]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[53]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[54]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[55]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[56]  Alberto López,et al.  Understanding co-operative R&D activity: evidence from four European countries , 2005 .

[57]  Scott Shane,et al.  Economic development through entrepreneurship : government, university and business linkages , 2005 .

[58]  I. Feller,et al.  An Historical Perspective on Government-University Partnerships to Enhance Entrepreneurship and Economic Development , 2005 .

[59]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[60]  Lisa A Bero,et al.  Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[61]  Yu Xie,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation , 2006 .

[62]  M. Feldman,et al.  Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development , 2006 .

[63]  Zella King,et al.  Knowledge production and university business interaction in the life sciences , 2006 .

[64]  M. Balconi,et al.  University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics , 2006 .

[65]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[66]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[67]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[68]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[69]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .

[70]  Laura Abramovsky,et al.  University Research and the Location of Business R&D , 2007 .

[71]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[72]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[73]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry , 2007 .

[74]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[75]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[76]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[77]  C. González-Brambila,et al.  Faculty Entrepreneurs and Research Productivity , 2007 .

[78]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures , 2007 .

[79]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[80]  Mike Wright,et al.  The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications , 2007 .

[81]  Nicola Baldini,et al.  Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence , 2008, Scientometrics.

[82]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[83]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[84]  Brent Goldfarb,et al.  The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output , 2008 .

[85]  A. Neely,et al.  Citation Counts: Are They Good Predictors of Rae Scores? A Bibliometric Analysis of RAE 2001 , 2008 .

[86]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[87]  Markus Perkmann,et al.  Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry , 2008 .

[88]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment , 2008 .

[89]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[90]  Denisa Mindruta,et al.  Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach , 2008 .

[91]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[92]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .