The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence.

The internet is now a major source of health information for lay people. Within the medical, sociological and popular literatures there have been three main responses to this development. We classify these as "celebratory", "concerned" and "contingent". This paper falls into the third category and, drawing on techniques of discourse analysis, examines people's accounts of their use of online health resources. It identifies six implicit rules--which we call "rhetorics of reliability"--that people readily draw upon when articulating why they trust some online sources and not others. In addition participants locate their accounts within broader discursive frameworks in order to present themselves as "sensible" users. The article concludes by suggesting that there is an emerging concordance between the lay use of the internet for health and illness and dominant (generally) biomedical conceptions of what constitutes "good quality" health information.

[1]  C. Seale.  New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[2]  A. Broom.  The eMale , 2005 .

[3]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation analysis and discourse analysis : a comparative and critical introduction , 2005 .

[4]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Jarkko Kari,et al.  Conceptions of the Internet in Everyday Life Information Seeking , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  S. Niemeyer,et al.  Health risk communication and amplification: learning from the MMR vaccination controversy , 2004 .

[8]  Faiza H. Hirji.  Freedom or Folly? Canadians and the Consumption of Online Health Information , 2004 .

[9]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Health E-types? , 2004 .

[10]  Peter Williams,et al.  Health information on the Internet: a qualitative study of NHS Direct Online users , 2003, Aslib Proc..

[11]  James Gillett,et al.  Media activism and Internet use by people with HIV/AIDS. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[12]  S. Wyatt,et al.  'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[13]  Elizabeth Dowler,et al.  Short cuts to safety: Risk and 'rules of thumb' in accounts of food choice , 2003 .

[14]  S. Pandey,et al.  Women's health and the internet: understanding emerging trends and implications. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[15]  C. Shilling.  Culture, the 'sick role' and the consumption of health. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[16]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Prostate cancer: embodied experience and perceptions of masculinity , 2002 .

[17]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  Lynn Eaton.  UK government aims to integrate health information on the internet , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  F. Charatan,et al.  UK government aims to integrate health information on the internet , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Steven Muncer,et al.  Reliability of Health Information on the Internet: An Examination of Experts' Ratings , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Michael Hardey,et al.  ‘The Story of My Illness’: Personal Accounts of Illness on the Internet , 2002 .

[24]  S. Lash.  Critique of information , 2002 .

[25]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Medicine on the line? Computer‐mediated social support and advice for people with diabetes , 2002 .

[26]  D W Light,et al.  Managed competition, governmentality and institutional response in the United Kingdom. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[27]  P. Streefland.  Public doubts about vaccination safety and resistance against vaccination. , 2001, Health policy.

[28]  Steven Johnson,et al.  Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software , 2001 .

[29]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[30]  V P Abbott,et al.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[31]  M. Hardey.  Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[32]  M A Graber,et al.  Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. , 1999, The Journal of family practice.

[33]  D. Lupton.  Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[34]  T. Rhodes.  Risk theory in epidemic times: sex, drugs and the social organisation of ‘risk behaviour’ , 1997 .

[35]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[36]  D. Smith.  `K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account , 1978 .