Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Familiarity as Indexed by ERPs

ERPs were recorded from samples of young (18–29 years) and older (63–77 years) participants while they performed a modified “remember–know” recognition memory test. ERP correlates of familiarity-driven recognition were obtained by contrasting the waveforms elicited by unrecollected test items accorded “confident old” and “confident new” judgments. Correlates of recollection were identified by contrasting the ERPs elicited by items accorded “remember” and confident old judgments. Behavioral analyses revealed lower estimates of both recollection and familiarity in older participants than in young participants. The putative ERP correlate of recollection—the “left parietal old–new effect”—was evident in both age groups, although it was slightly but significantly smaller in the older sample. By contrast, the putative ERP correlate of familiarity—the “midfrontal old–new effect”—could be identified in young participants only. This age-related difference in the sensitivity of ERPs to familiarity was also evident in subgroups of young and older participants, in whom familiarity-based recognition performance was equivalent. Thus, the inability to detect a reliable midfrontal old–new effect in older participants was not a consequence of an age-related decline in the strength of familiarity. These findings raise the possibility that familiarity-based recognition memory depends upon qualitatively different memory signals in older and young adults.

[1]  M. Prull,et al.  Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: adult age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[2]  A J Parkin,et al.  Recollective experience, normal aging, and frontal dysfunction. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[3]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Rugg,et al.  Age effects on brain activity associated with episodic memory retrieval. An electrophysiological study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J D E Gabrieli,et al.  Age-associated reduction of asymmetry in prefrontal function and preservation of conceptual repetition priming , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Yonelinas Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  L L Jacoby,et al.  An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollection: telling effects of repetition. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[8]  David A Bennett,et al.  Repetition priming and change in functional ability in older persons without dementia. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[9]  M. Rugg,et al.  The effects of age on the neural correlates of successful episodic retrieval: An ERP study , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition , 2010, Brain Research.

[11]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  The Role of Noncriterial Recollection in Estimating Recollection and Familiarity. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  T. Perfect,et al.  Age differences in reported recollective experience are due to encoding effects, not response bias. , 1995, Memory.

[13]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Effects of age on retrieval cue processing as revealed by ERPs , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Effects of age on estimated familiarity in the process dissociation procedure: The role of noncriterial recollection , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Retrieval Cue Processing are Modulated by Task Demands , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Christine Bastin,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition memory: a study of the effects of test format and aging. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[18]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[19]  L. Jacoby,et al.  The Relation between Remembering and Knowing as Bases for Recognition: Effects of Size Congruency , 1995 .

[20]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[21]  S. Cansino Episodic memory decay along the adult lifespan: a review of behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Tracy H. Wang,et al.  Effects of age on negative subsequent memory effects associated with the encoding of item and item-context information. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory , 2007, Brain Research.

[26]  D. Friedman,et al.  Memory Encoding and Retrieval in the Aging Brain , 2007, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[27]  Debra A. Fleischman,et al.  Repetition Priming in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: An Integrative Review and Future Directions , 2007, Cortex.

[28]  Chunyan Guo,et al.  Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters , 2013, Brain Research.

[29]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Aging reduces veridical remembering but increases false remembering: Neuropsychological test correlates of remember–know judgments , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  ERP correlates of item recognition memory: Effects of age and performance , 2009, Brain Research.

[31]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  L. Taconnat,et al.  The effect of aging in recollective experience: The processing speed and executive functioning hypothesis , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  David Friedman,et al.  Dissociations between memory for temporal order and recognition memory in aging , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  D. Friedman Cognition and Aging: A Highly Selective Overview of Event-Related Potential (ERP) Data , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[35]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[36]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Johan Hellman,et al.  Familiarity or Conceptual Priming: Event-related Potentials in Name Recognition , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Familiarity Memory , 2006, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[40]  Francis Eustache,et al.  Early age-related changes in episodic memory retrieval as revealed by event-related potentials , 2009, Neuroreport.

[41]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Intact Recollection Memory in High-performing Older Adults: ERP and Behavioral Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[44]  M. Rugg,et al.  Context Effects on the Neural Correlates of Recognition Memory An Electrophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[45]  M. D Rugg,et al.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming , 2004, NeuroImage.

[46]  D. Friedman Event-related brain potential investigations of memory and aging , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[47]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[48]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.

[49]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Conceptual Priming and Familiarity: Different Expressions of Memory during Recognition Testing with Distinct Neurophysiological Correlates , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  William P. Milberg,et al.  Aging memory for pictures: Using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Fluent Conceptual Processing and Explicit Memory for Faces Are Electrophysiologically Distinct , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  David Friedman,et al.  Age-related changes in source memory retrieval: an ERP replication and extension. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  Johan Hellman,et al.  “Do You See Yonder Cloud?”—On Priming Concepts, A New Test, and a Familiar Outcome. Reply to Lucas et al.: “Familiarity or Conceptual Priming? Good Question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009)” , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[56]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[57]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory , 2013, NeuroImage.

[58]  Jutta Kray,et al.  We remember the good things: Age differences in learning and memory , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[59]  David Friedman,et al.  Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: An ERP perspective , 2010, Brain Research.

[60]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[61]  T. Perfect,et al.  What underlies the deficit in reported recollective experience in old age? , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Functional significance of retrieval‐related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[65]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Dissociates Working Memory Manipulation from Retention Functions in the Prefrontal, but not Posterior Parietal, Cortex , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  John T Wixted,et al.  Measuring recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe , 2010, Hippocampus.