Performance of Multi-Hop Whisper Cognitive Radio Networks

In 2003, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a new spectrum policy called ``Interference Temperature model" to improve the channel access opportunities of secondary users. Under this model, the secondary users are allowed to access the licensed spectrum simultaneously with the primary users provided that the interference at the primary receiver meets a certain threshold. We refer the Cognitive Radio Networks that employs this model as ``Whisper CRNs" (since secondary users have to use smaller transmission power to satisfy the interference constraint). In this work, we systematically analyze the performance of whisper CRNs and compare it with the traditional CRNs, where the secondary users are not allowed to transmit when primary users are busy. We aim to answer the fundamental question: what is the performance trade-off by switching to whisper CRNs from traditional CRNs. Based on the performance analysis, we also propose an efficient channel assignment scheme that has a small channel switching overhead. The results show that whisper CRNs can improve the connectivity and end-to-end throughput of secondary users considerably (by more than two times in some scenarios) but at the cost of increasing end-to-end delay. We also show that the node density of secondary users has a significant impact on the performance of whisper CRNs.

[1]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Resource allocation for spectrum underlay in cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  TTDD: Two-Tier Data Dissemination in Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[3]  Wenbo Wang,et al.  Optimal Power Control Under Interference Temperature Constraints in Cognitive Radio Network , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  Excursions in Geometry , 1990 .

[5]  T. Charles Clancy,et al.  Achievable Capacity Under the Interference Temperature Model , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks , 2009, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  Paul J. Kolodzy,et al.  Interference temperature: a metric for dynamic spectrum utilization , 2006, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[8]  S. Kanhere,et al.  Hop Count Analysis for Greedy Geographic Routing , 2008 .

[9]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[10]  Dong In Kim,et al.  Joint rate and power allocation for cognitive radios in dynamic spectrum access environment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Rajarathnam Chandramouli,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access with QoS and Interference Temperature Constraints , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  T. Charles Clancy Dynamic spectrum access using the interference temperature model , 2009, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[13]  Rui Zhang On Peak versus Average Interference Power Constraints for Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[14]  Kai Niu,et al.  Optimal Power Control Game Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Networks with Multiple Interference Temperature Limits , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[15]  Dong In Kim,et al.  Large-scale joint rate and power allocation algorithm combined with admission control in cognitive radio networks , 2009, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[16]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GHT: a geographic hash table for data-centric storage , 2002, WSNA '02.

[17]  Zhong-Ping Jiang,et al.  Distributed power control and random access for spectrum sharing with QoS constraint , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[18]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A geometric approach to improve spectrum efficiency for cognitive relay networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.