Revistiting the Relationship Between Non-Blocking Atomic Commitment and Consensus
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Danny Dolev,et al. A Simple Model for Agreement in Distributed Systems , 1986, Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing.
[2] Rachid Guerraoui,et al. Non blocking atomic commitment with an unreliable failure detector , 1995, Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems.
[3] André Schiper,et al. Primary Partition "Virtually-Synchronous Communication" harder than Consensus , 1994, WDAG.
[4] Ozalp Babaoglu,et al. Non-blocking atomic commitment , 1993 .
[5] Dale Skeen,et al. Nonblocking commit protocols , 1981, SIGMOD '81.
[6] Nancy A. Lynch,et al. Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process , 1983, PODS '83.
[7] Vassos Hadzilacos,et al. On the Relationship Between the Atomic Commitment and Consensus Problems , 1990, Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing.
[8] Jim Gray. A Comparison of the Byzantine Agreement Problem and the Transaction Commit Problem , 1986, Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing.
[9] Keith Marzullo,et al. Election Vs. Consensus in Asynchronous Systems , 1995 .
[10] Sam Toueg,et al. The weakest failure detector for solving consensus , 1992, PODC '92.
[11] Sam Toueg,et al. Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems , 1996, JACM.
[12] Rachid Guerraoui,et al. Transaction Model vs. Virtual Synchrony Model: Bridging the Gap , 1994, Dagstuhl Seminar on Distributed Systems.
[13] Rachid Guerraoui,et al. The Decentralized Non-Blocking Atomic Commitment Protocol , 1995, Proceedings.Seventh IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing.