Neuronal processing of behaviourally generated optic flow: experiments and model simulations

The stimuli traditionally used for analysing visual information processing are much simpler than what an animal sees when moving in its natural environment. Therefore, we analysed in a previous study the performance of an identified neuron in the optomotor system of the fly by using as visual stimuli image sequences that were experienced by the animal while walking in a structured environment. These electrophysiological experiments revealed that the fly visual system computes from behaviourally generated optic flow a rather unambiguous representation of the animal's self-motion. In contrast to conclusions based on simple stimuli, the directions of turns are represented by an interneuron, the HSE cell, quite independent of the spatial layout of the environment and its textural properties when the cell is stimulated with behaviourally generated optic flow. This conclusion is substantiated here by further experimental evidence. Moreover, it is shown that the largely unambiguous responses of the HSE cell to behaviourally generated optic flow can be replicated to a large extent by a network model of the fly's visual motion pathway. These results stress the significance of naturalistic stimuli for analysing what is encoded by neuronal circuits under natural operating conditions.

[1]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Processing of Naturalistic Optic Flow , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Borst,et al.  A look into the cockpit of the fly: visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Laughlin.  Matching coding, circuits, cells, and molecules to signals: General principles of retinal design in the fly's eye , 1994, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[4]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Encoding of motion in real time by the fly visual system , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  Raimond Matthias Wüst,et al.  Extracting egomotion parameters from optic flow: principal limits for animals and machines , 1997 .

[7]  R Hengstenberg.  Multisensensory control in insect oculomotor systems (In:Visual Motion and its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze, ed. by Miles,F.A. and Wallman,J.) , 1993 .

[8]  C L Baker,et al.  Spatial- and temporal-frequency selectivity as a basis for velocity preference in cat striate cortex neurons , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[9]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Performance of Fly Visual Interneurons during Object Fixation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Adaptation and the temporal delay filter of fly motion detectors , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Visual Motion and Its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze , 1992 .

[12]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of periodic complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat , 1978, Vision Research.

[13]  A. Smit,et al.  Synapse Formation between Central Neurons Requires Postsynaptic Expression of the MEN1 Tumor Suppressor Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[15]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  Binocular contributions to optic flow processing in the fly visual system. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neuronal representation of optic flow experienced by unilaterally blinded flies on their mean walking trajectories , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  A. S. French,et al.  Information processing by graded-potential transmission through tonically active synapses , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[20]  A. Borst,et al.  Encoding of Visual Motion Information and Reliability in Spiking and Graded Potential Neurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[22]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[23]  H Sherk,et al.  Simulated optic flow and extrastriate cortex. I. Optic flow versus texture. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  F. Dodge,et al.  Deciphering a neural code for vision. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[26]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Motion detection in insect orientation and navigation , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  H. Sherk,et al.  Simulated optic flow and extrastriate cortex. II. Responses to bar versus large-field stimuli. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Optic flow and eye movements. , 2000, International review of neurobiology.

[30]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Outdoor performance of a motion-sensitive neuron in the blowfly , 2001, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Optomotor course control in flies with largely asymmetric visual input , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  A M Prestrude,et al.  Visual latencies at photopic levels of retinal illuminance. , 1971, Vision research.

[33]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Synaptic interactions increase optic flow specificity , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  Vincent G. Dethier,et al.  The Hungry Fly: A Physiological Study of the Behavior Associated with Feeding , 1976 .

[35]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  INTRINSIC PROPERTIES OF BIOLOGICAL MOTION DETECTORS PREVENT THE OPTOMOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM FROM GETTING UNSTABLE , 1996 .

[36]  H G Krapp,et al.  Neuronal matched filters for optic flow processing in flying insects. , 2000, International review of neurobiology.

[37]  R O Dror,et al.  Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Dendritic calcium accumulation associated with direction-selective adaptation in visual motion-sensitive neurons in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[40]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Contrast Gain Reduction in Fly Motion Adaptation , 2000, Neuron.

[41]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity and Gain Control in Visual Interneurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  M Lappe,et al.  Neuronal responses in the motion pathway of the macaque monkey to natural optic flow stimuli , 1996, Neuroreport.