Yeast Dynamically Modify Their Environment to Achieve Better Mating Efficiency

By reshaping the pheromone gradient through proteolysis, yeast find partners of the opposite “sex” for mating. Enhancing Attraction to the Opposite Sex Budding yeast exist as two sexes, MATa and MATα, and the different cell types locate their opposite-sex partners through the release of pheromones; MATα cells secrete the pheromone α-factor, which stimulates growth toward and eventual mating with MATa cells. Jin et al. used simulation and experimental validation to gain insight into the mechanisms by which the secreted protease Bar1, which is produced by MATa cells and degrades α-factor, promotes efficient mating. Their results suggest that Bar1 reshapes the gradient around the MATa cells, enabling them to sharpen the pheromone gradient, move away from other MATa cells to reduce same-sex encounters, and search a larger area to find appropriate mates of the opposite sex. The maintenance and detection of signaling gradients are critical for proper development and cell migration. In single-cell organisms, gradient detection allows cells to orient toward a distant mating partner or nutrient source. Budding yeast expand their growth toward mating pheromone gradients through a process known as chemotropic growth. MATα cells secrete α-factor pheromone that stimulates chemotropism and mating differentiation in MATa cells and vice versa. Paradoxically, MATa cells secrete Bar1, a protease that degrades α-factor and that attenuates the mating response, yet is also required for efficient mating. We observed that MATa cells avoid each other during chemotropic growth. To explore this behavior, we developed a computational platform to simulate chemotropic growth. Our simulations indicated that the release of Bar1 enabled individual MATa cells to act as α-factor sinks. The simulations suggested that the resultant local reshaping of pheromone concentration created gradients that were directed away from neighboring MATa cells (self-avoidance) and that were increasingly amplified toward partners of the opposite sex during elongation. The behavior of Bar1-deficient cells in gradient chambers and mating assays supported these predictions from the simulations. Thus, budding yeast dynamically remodel their environment to ensure productive responses to an external stimulus and avoid nonproductive cell-cell interactions.

[1]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Pheromones and pheromone receptors are the primary determinants of mating specificity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[2]  J Abbott,et al.  SIGNALLING - THE WAY FORWARD , 2000 .

[3]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Assay of yeast mating reaction. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[4]  M. Snyder,et al.  A filamentous growth response mediated by the yeast mating pathway. , 2001, Genetics.

[5]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[6]  J. Thorner,et al.  Recovery of S. cerevisiae a cells from G1 arrest by α factor pheromone requires endopeptidase action , 1979, Cell.

[7]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Protease helps yeast find mating partners , 1998, Nature.

[8]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  J. Segall,et al.  Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. K. Chan,et al.  Physiological characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by a factor and alpha factor pheromones , 1982, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  C. Parent,et al.  The group migration of Dictyostelium cells is regulated by extracellular chemoattractant degradation. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  S. Kaminskyj,et al.  A role for a complex between activated G protein-coupled receptors in yeast cellular mating , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Amy S. Gladfelter,et al.  Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Evidence for a new diffusible element of mating pheromones in yeast , 1976, Nature.

[16]  R. Bennett,et al.  Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans , 2009, Nature.

[17]  J. Hasty,et al.  Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[18]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Binding of alpha-factor pheromone to Saccharomyces cerevisiae a cells: dissociation constant and number of binding sites , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  David Y. Thomas,et al.  Expression of MFα1 in MATa cells supersensitive to α-factor leads to self-arrest , 1988, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[20]  Roger Brent,et al.  Detailed Simulations of Cell Biology with Smoldyn 2.1 , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Leland H. Hartwell,et al.  Courtship in S. cerevisiae: Both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal , 1990, Cell.