Changing land use in the countryside: Stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders

Abstract Rural areas in densely populated regions face increasing competition for land. Consequently, land use planning processes must attempt to balance the goals of diverse stakeholders and the process of reaching consensus becomes more complicated. By investigating the perception of the actors involved in rural planning, this research contributes to the knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of such processes. We have focused on the case of rural planning processes in Flanders in which proponents of nature and agriculture are competing for land. Data are collected through open interviews with key actors such as farmers, representatives of nature preservation organisations, farmers’ unions, and employees of the relevant governmental policy areas. Data analysis according to the grounded theory approach resulted in six categories and 26 concepts that represent the stakeholders’ perception of difficulties in the Flemish rural planning approach. Three points where difficulties arise are (1) the link between envisioning, drawing up the plan and implementation, (2) the need for data, and (3) the role of sectors. We use three concepts from literature (procedural justice, distributive justice and value conflicts) to frame the difficulties observed. Based on this analysis, we discuss several ways to improve rural planning processes.

[1]  Thomas Sieverts.  Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt , 2003 .

[2]  Hans Leinfelder,et al.  Underrated transformations in the open space—The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area , 2010 .

[3]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[4]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[5]  M. Wolsink.  Reshaping the Dutch Planning System: A Learning Process? , 2003 .

[6]  J. Duke,et al.  Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[7]  Hans Leinfelder.  Open ruimte als publieke ruimte , 2007 .

[8]  P. Healey.  Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times , 2006 .

[9]  E. Koomen,et al.  Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects , 2008 .

[10]  Roel Jongeneel,et al.  Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional , 2008 .

[11]  H. Couclelis.  “Where has the Future Gone?” Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning , 2005 .

[12]  L. Firbank,et al.  Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review , 2008 .

[13]  Elisabeth Conrad.  The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation , 2012 .

[14]  T. Koontz.  The farmer, the planner, and the local citizen in the dell: how collaborative groups plan for farmland preservation , 2003 .

[15]  Ingo Zasada,et al.  Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming , 2011 .

[16]  W. Boonstra.  Polder limits : a case study of value-conflicts on Dutch rural land use , 2006 .

[17]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  C. Persson,et al.  Planning approaches for rurban areas: Case studies from Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands , 2009 .

[19]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[20]  Shorna R. Broussard,et al.  Attitudes toward policies to protect open space: A comparative study of government planning officials and the general public , 2008 .

[21]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Spatial representations are not neutral: Lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  M. Zabik,et al.  Challenges to planning for rural character: A case study from exurban southern , 2013 .

[23]  M Tewdwr-Jones,et al.  Collaborative Action in Local Plan-Making: Planners' Perceptions of ‘Planning through Debate’ , 1998 .

[24]  K. Oltmer.  AGRICULTURAL POLICY, LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: STUDIES IN QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH SYNTHESIS , 2003 .

[25]  A. Valk.  The Dutch Planning Experience , 2002 .

[26]  John R Wood,et al.  Greed, need or creed? Farmland ethics in the rural-urban fringe , 1998 .

[27]  A. Frenkel.  The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland , 2004 .

[28]  Social Ethics of Landscape Change , 2008 .

[29]  A. Gilg.  Perceptions about land use , 2009 .

[30]  N. Gallent,et al.  Planning on the edge , 2006 .

[31]  M. Tewdwr-Jones.  Rural government and community participation: The planning role of community councils , 1998 .

[32]  D. O’Connor,et al.  Stakeholders’ perceptions of forestry in rural areas—Two case studies in Ireland , 2009 .

[33]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[34]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[35]  D. Trakolis.  Local people's perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[37]  Michael Jones.  European Landscape and Participation – Rhetoric or Reality? , 2011 .

[38]  Pelin Alpkokin,et al.  Historical and critical review of spatial and transport planning in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[39]  A. Herzele,et al.  Combining deliberative governance theory and discourse analysis to understand the deliberative incompleteness of centrally formulated plans , 2012 .

[40]  D. Schmied.  Winning and losing : the changing geography of Europe's rural areas , 2005 .

[41]  E. Rogge,et al.  How to visualise the invisible: Revealing re-use of rural buildings by non-agricultural entrepreneurs in the region of Roeselare–Tielt (Belgium) , 2012 .

[42]  W. Howard,et al.  Conflicts Over Farming Practices in Canada: The Role of Interactive Conflict Resolution Approaches , 2000 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[44]  A. Valk,et al.  Planning and the challenges of the metropolitan landscape: innovation in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[45]  C. Persson,et al.  Managing rurban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden: Comparing planning systems and instruments in three different contexts , 2008 .

[46]  J. Michael,et al.  The European landscape convention: challenges of participation , 2011 .

[47]  M. Antrop.  Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe , 2004 .

[48]  Sherry R. Amstein.  “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[49]  T. Sager.  Responsibilities of theorists: The case of communicative planning theory , 2009 .

[50]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined , 2004 .

[51]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Prioritising land to be preserved for agriculture: A context-specific value tree , 2011 .

[52]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[53]  Tseira Maruani,et al.  Open space planning models: A review of approaches and methods , 2007 .

[54]  Marjolein Spaans,et al.  Using compensation instruments as a vehicle to improve spatial planning: challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[55]  Cornelia Butler Flora.  Seeds of Transition , 2005 .

[56]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[57]  R. Soliva.  Landscape stories: Using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies , 2007 .

[58]  P. Healey.  Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[59]  J. Dessein,et al.  Stakeholders perception of attitudes towards major landscape changes held by the public: The case of greenhouse clusters in Flanders , 2011 .