its role in

Development in mammals is accompanied by speci fi c de novo and demethylation events that are thought to stabilize differentiated cell phenotypes. We demonstrate that a large percentage of the tissue-speci fi c methylation pattern is generated postnatally. Demethylation in the liver is observed in thousands of enhancer-like sequences associated with genes that undergo activation during the fi rst few weeks of life. Using a conditional gene ablation strategy we show that the removal of these methyl groups is stable and necessary for assuring proper hepatocyte gene expression and function through its effect on chromatin accessibility. These postnatal changes in methylation come about through exposure to hormone signaling. These results de fi ne the molecular rules of 5-methyl-cytosine regulation as an epigenetic mechanism underlying cellular responses to a changing environment. each one of them contained on average six different samples, we could repeat this process numerous times. In the case of hepatocytes, the original number of hepatocyte-speci fi c unmethylated regions was ~9000, and analysis of 10,000 permutations yielded at most fi ve DMRs. The reason for this very low number is that when comparing mixed tissues to other tissues with our very stringent parameters, it yields almost no DMRs, demonstrating the purity of our DMRS. The p value was calculated to be smaller than 10 − 4 since for 10,000 permutations almost no DMRs were found. DMRs were also validated by the examination of methylation status on new RRBS and WGBS samples that did not participate in the original analysis. In addition, comparison using methylKit in R with similar cutoff criteria detected 4790 DMRs, of which 93% overlapped with the 9291 DMRs generated by our algorithm ( p value <10 − 100 as determined by the χ 2 test of homogeneity). These average of Our studies also us to look at the overall effects of preventing demethylation. example, identi fi ed a total of about 870 genes that are expressed at lower levels in the DKO as compared to WT 20-week hepatocytes and many of these ( n are signi cantly upregulated postnatally. We also detected 790 genes that are actually upregulated in the knockout as compared to WT. These changes may result from indirect effects downstream of the primary methyl-dependent genes or from activities of the TET proteins not related to DNA methylation 52 . Alternately, they may come about as a compensation response to changes in physiology resulting from the DKO. Expression in non-hepatocyte derived from published

[1]  K. Kaestner,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of intestinal stem cells by Tet1-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation , 2016, Genes & development.

[2]  D. Serre,et al.  Extensive Epigenetic Changes Accompany Terminal Differentiation of Mouse Hepatocytes After Birth , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[3]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Tissue-specific DNA demethylation is required for proper B-cell differentiation and function , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  K. Helin,et al.  Role of TET enzymes in DNA methylation, development, and cancer , 2016, Genes & development.

[5]  J. Schug,et al.  Integration of ATAC-seq and RNA-seq identifies human alpha cell and beta cell signature genes , 2016, Molecular metabolism.

[6]  Anaïs F. Bardet,et al.  Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1 , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Aging-Dependent Demethylation of Regulatory Elements Correlates with Chromatin State and Improved β Cell Function. , 2015, Cell metabolism.

[8]  G. Hannon,et al.  An epigenetic memory of pregnancy in the mouse mammary gland. , 2015, Cell reports.

[9]  B. Berman,et al.  Gender-specific postnatal demethylation and establishment of epigenetic memory , 2015, Genes & development.

[10]  D. Odom,et al.  Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture , 2015, Cell reports.

[11]  Aziz Khan,et al.  dbSUPER: a database of super-enhancers in mouse and human genome , 2015, bioRxiv.

[12]  Klaus Rajewsky,et al.  TET proteins and 5‐methylcytosine oxidation in hematological cancers , 2015, Immunological reviews.

[13]  J. Marioni,et al.  Genome-wide Bisulfite Sequencing in Zygotes Identifies Demethylation Targets and Maps the Contribution of TET3 Oxidation , 2014, Cell reports.

[14]  T. Bestor,et al.  Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  V. Beneš,et al.  Dynamic DNA methylation orchestrates cardiomyocyte development, maturation and disease , 2014, Nature Communications.

[16]  Jin He,et al.  Tet3 and DNA replication mediate demethylation of both the maternal and paternal genomes in mouse zygotes. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[17]  Lu Wen,et al.  Active and passive demethylation of male and female pronuclear DNA in the mammalian zygote. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[18]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation , 2014, Genes & development.

[19]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Loss of Tet enzymes compromises proper differentiation of embryonic stem cells. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[20]  Jonathan Schug,et al.  DNA methylation is required for the control of stem cell differentiation in the small intestine , 2014, Genes & development.

[21]  Hao Wu,et al.  Reversing DNA Methylation: Mechanisms, Genomics, and Biological Functions , 2014, Cell.

[22]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position , 2013, Nature Methods.

[23]  G. Hon,et al.  Adult tissue methylomes harbor epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[24]  A. Gnirke,et al.  Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions , 2013, Genome Biology.

[26]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Stage-specific roles for tet1 and tet2 in DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[27]  R. Wells,et al.  Robust cellular reprogramming occurs spontaneously during liver regeneration. , 2013, Genes & development.

[28]  Sivan Sabato,et al.  DNA methylation of distal regulatory sites characterizes dysregulation of cancer genes , 2013, Genome Biology.

[29]  Zachary D. Smith,et al.  Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling , 2012, Genome Biology.

[30]  Howard Cedar,et al.  Programming of DNA methylation patterns. , 2012, Annual review of biochemistry.

[31]  Sinisa Hrvatin,et al.  Functional beta-cell maturation is marked by an increased glucose threshold and by expression of urocortin 3 , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  A. Rao,et al.  TET2: epigenetic safeguard for HSC. , 2011, Blood.

[33]  Z. Deng,et al.  The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes , 2011, Nature.

[34]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Ten-Eleven-Translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  G. Ming,et al.  Emerging roles of TET proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosines in active DNA demethylation and beyond , 2011, Cell cycle.

[36]  W. Reik,et al.  5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. , 2011, Nature communications.

[37]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[38]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification , 2010, Nature.

[39]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[40]  S. Celton-Morizur,et al.  Polyploidy and liver proliferation: Central role of insulin signaling , 2010, Cell cycle.

[41]  Wei Li,et al.  BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[42]  G. Tiegs,et al.  Down-regulation of the De-ubiquitinating Enzyme Ubiquitin-specific Protease 2 Contributes to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-induced Hepatocyte Survival* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  H. Cedar,et al.  De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[44]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Fine Tuning of Globin Gene Expression by DNA Methylation , 2006, PloS one.

[45]  H. Cedar,et al.  G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  Michael J Meaney,et al.  Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Howard Cedar,et al.  DNA methylation represses transcription in vivo , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[48]  C. Kahn,et al.  A muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibits features of the metabolic syndrome of NIDDM without altering glucose tolerance. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[49]  Howard Cedar,et al.  DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin , 1986, Cell.

[50]  S. Celton-Morizur,et al.  Central role of insulin signaling , 2010 .

[51]  J. Girard Metabolic adaptations to change of nutrition at birth. , 1990, Biology of the neonate.