Values in Knowledge Organization Standards: A Value Analysis of Resource Description and Access (RDA)

Knowledge organization standards are important community artifacts that set forth agreed upon specifications and protocols, and though they may appear neutral they have been shown to harbor specific perspectives. These perspectives are often covert but hold implications for the ways in which knowledge is conceptualized, organized, and represented. Values are deeply held preferences for ways of acting and ways of being, and represent an effective lens for examining the perspectives embedded in societal practices and artifacts. To date, however, knowledge organization standards have not been approached through formal value analysis. This study addresses this gap through an examination of the influential library standard Resource Description and Access (RDA), specifically focusing on what values are present within this standard, how these values are communicated, and how they are recognized and responded to by practitioners. To address these questions, a qualitative, exploratory, multiphase study was conducted, utilizing value and rhetorical analyses of the text of RDA as well as open-ended interviews with RDA practitioners focused on their interpretations of the document. Findings show that RDA upholds its design principles through the expression of principles-based values and values associated with user needs, communicated through a set of routine structures such as directives and conditionals. In their usage of RDA, catalogers place greater emphasis on values associated with users and their perspectives, and see access as the most important value within this standard. At the same time, the relative absence of asserted community values such as privacy and autonomy illustrates the challenged nature of human values in knowledge organization standards. Findings from this study demonstrate the integral nature of values in standards, and position value analysis as a useful methodology in the critical study of standards in all domains. For the knowledge organization and cultural heritage communities, this work reveals the ways in which standards and their enactments serve to mediate key community values. In raising questions about the role of human values in knowledge organization standards, this study also contributes to ongoing discussions of information ethics and professional values. Values in Knowledge Organization Standards: A Value Analysis of Resource Description and Access (RDA)

[1]  Ingetraut Dahlberg,et al.  Knowledge organization : A new science? , 2006 .

[2]  C. Sherman ICONCLASS: A Historical Perspective , 1987 .

[3]  Marilena Vecco,et al.  A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible , 2010 .

[4]  E. Ruijgrok,et al.  The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[5]  Gretchen L. Hoffman Meeting Users’ Needs in Cataloging: What is the Right Thing to Do? , 2009 .

[6]  Alison Fields Our enduring values revisited: librarianship in an ever-changing world , 2016 .

[7]  H. Thaler,et al.  Implementing national standards for cancer pain management: program model and evaluation. , 1996, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

[8]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  Prolegomena to Library Classification , 1967 .

[9]  Pascal Wiggers,et al.  Elicitation of situated values: need for tools to help stakeholders and designers to reflect and communicate , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[10]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  The moral economy of grades and standards , 2000 .

[11]  Judith A. Ranta Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for Cataloging Community Information , 1996 .

[12]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[13]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[14]  James Weber Identifying and Assessing Managerial Value Orientations: A Cross-Generational Replication Study of Key Organizational Decision-Makers’ Values , 2015 .

[15]  Jean Harden Inadvertent RDA: New Catalogers’ Errors in AACR2 , 2012 .

[16]  Nancy B. Lester A System for Analyzing Characters' Values in Literary Texts. , 1982 .

[17]  Anna M. Ferris The Ethics and Integrity of Cataloging , 2008 .

[18]  Sheila A. Bair Toward a Code of Ethics for Cataloging , 2005 .

[19]  Beatriz Manzor Mitrzyk,et al.  Practical Research Methods for Librarians and Information Professionals , 2008 .

[20]  mile .QDurkheim mile Durkheim,et al.  The Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 1916 .

[21]  Karen Markey,et al.  The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[22]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[23]  Lynne C. Howarth,et al.  Enigma Variations: Parsing the Riddle of Main Entry and the “Rule of Three” from AACR2 to RDA , 2008 .

[24]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  How information systems communicate as documents: the concept of authorial voice , 2011, J. Documentation.

[25]  Patricia Harpring,et al.  Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images , 2006 .

[26]  Hope A. Olson How We Construct Subjects: A Feminist Analysis , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[27]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[28]  Amy K. Weiss Proliferating guidelines: A history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources , 2003 .

[29]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Two kinds of evidence: how information systems form rhetorical arguments , 2010, J. Documentation.

[30]  Rahmatollah Fattahi AACR2 and catalogue production technology: The relevance of cataloguing principles to the online environment , 1997 .

[31]  S. Timmermans,et al.  A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization* , 2010 .

[32]  Jonas Olson,et al.  Introduction to Value Theory , 2015 .

[33]  Ketan Mayer-Patel,et al.  YouTube: Applying FRBR and Exploring the Multiple Description Coding Compression Model , 2012 .

[34]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. , 1971 .

[35]  P. Dixon,et al.  Effects of sentence form on the construction of mental plans from procedural discourse. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[36]  Ralph K. White,et al.  Value Analysis: The Nature And Use Of The Method , 2012 .

[37]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Professional values and ethics as defined by the LIS discipline , 2003 .

[38]  Patrick Lambe From Cataloguers to Designers: Paul Otlet, Social Impact and a More Proactive Role for Knowledge Organization Professionals , 2015 .

[39]  A. Pearlman,et al.  Measuring up. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[40]  Sara Shatford Layne Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) , 2010 .

[41]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  The Five Laws of Library Science , 1948 .

[42]  Brian Dobreski,et al.  Applying motivational design to support informal learning of universal design for web applications , 2017 .

[43]  Melodie J. Fox,et al.  Which Ethics? Whose Morality?: An Analysis of Ethical Standards for Information Organization , 2012 .

[44]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[45]  M. D. L. Torre Heritage Values in Site Management: Four Case Studies , 2005 .

[46]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data , 2008 .

[47]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[49]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Standards and their stories : how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life , 2009 .

[50]  Mauro Guerrini,et al.  RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data , 2016 .

[51]  Joan Swanekamp The Changing Cataloging Culture: What Do We Mean When We Talk About Cataloger Values? , 1998 .

[52]  Mandalay Grems,et al.  Standards , 1987, CACM.

[53]  Henrik Wallheim From Complex Reality to Formal Description: Bibliographic Relationships and Problems of Operationalization in RDA , 2016 .

[54]  Dennis Nicholson The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2003 .

[55]  Elyssa M. Sanner Preliminary Training for RDA: A Survey of Cataloging Department Heads , 2012 .

[56]  Melissa Gill,et al.  Encoding Multilingual Knowledge Systems in the Digital Age: The Getty Vocabularies , 2015 .

[57]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  Blogging as recovery: The use of blogs by survivors of military sexual trauma , 2017, ASIST.

[58]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Observing the Materiality of Values in Information Systems Research , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[59]  Elisa Lanzi,et al.  The Cataloging Cultural Objects experience: Codifying practice for the cultural heritage community , 2010 .

[60]  Joseph T. Tennis,et al.  Modeling the aesthetic axis of information organization frameworks, part 2: Case studies , 2013, J. Documentation.

[61]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[62]  Brian Dobreski,et al.  Exploring the role of repertoire in library cataloging , 2019, J. Documentation.

[63]  M. Hills Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's Values Orientation Theor y , 2002 .

[64]  Mary W. Elings,et al.  Metadata for all: Descriptive standards and metadata sharing across libraries, archives and museums , 2007, First Monday.

[65]  Capitalism and rationality: A study of measurements in British coal mining, ca. 1750-1850 , 1983 .

[66]  Brian Dobreski Toward a value‐analytic approach to information standards , 2018, ASIST.

[67]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The Ethics of IT Professionals in Japan and China , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Rodrigo de Sales,et al.  O profissional da informação e o seu compromisso ético com a procedência da informação: uma análise do fenômeno das fake news à luz do IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and other information workers , 2019 .

[69]  Gabriel E. Osorio,et al.  Interplanetary Travel: Cluster Analysis of Inspec Classification Codes to Identify Main Subject Areas , 2016 .

[70]  Jon R. Hufford The Pragmatic Basis of Catalog Codes: Has the User Been Ignored? , 1992 .

[71]  Noreen Whysel,et al.  Linked open data for cultural heritage: evolution of an information technology , 2013, SIGDOC '13.

[72]  J. Mai Ethics, Values and Morality in Contemporary Library Classifications † , 2013 .

[73]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Information system design for communication: The use of genre as a design element , 2009, ASIST.

[74]  Thomas Burger,et al.  Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory.@@@The Evolution of Societies. , 1978 .

[75]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  Organizing Bibliographical Data with RDA: How Far Have We Stridden Toward the Semantic Web? , 2014 .

[76]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Developing a meta-inventory of human values , 2010, ASIST.

[77]  M. Bradbury,et al.  The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules , 2012 .

[78]  Yujin Kim The Pilot Study in Qualitative Inquiry , 2011 .

[79]  T. Parsons,et al.  PART 2. Values, Motives, and Systems of Action , 1951 .

[80]  Alan Poulter,et al.  The ‘Europeanisation’ of Cataloguing Codes: An Analysis of the Evolution of RDA , 2012 .

[81]  Taemin Kim Park,et al.  The Nature and Characteristics of Bibliographic Relationships in RDA Cataloging Records in OCLC at the Beginning of RDA Implementation , 2017 .

[82]  J. Huber,et al.  Stigmatizing Disability: Library Classifications and the Marking and Marginalization of Books about People with Disabilities , 2017, The Library Quarterly.

[83]  M. Bates The invisible substrate of information science , 1999 .

[84]  Yushiana Mansor,et al.  RDA perceptions among Malaysian catalogers , 2014 .

[85]  Birger Hjørland What is Knowledge Organization (KO) , 2008 .

[86]  P. Wilson Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[87]  G. Maio The Psychology of Human Values , 2016 .

[88]  David K. Farkas The Logical and Rhetorical Construction of Procedural Discourse , 1999 .

[89]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia - A large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia , 2015, Semantic Web.

[90]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Accommodating Indigenous Cultural Heritage Values in Resource Assessment: Cape York Peninsula and the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Murray Darling Program Working Paper M05_5 , 2007 .

[91]  Kathryn Luther Henderson Treated With A Degree Of Uniformity and Common Sense: Descriptive Cataloging In The United States, 1876-1975 , 1976 .

[92]  K. Baker,et al.  Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment , 2009 .

[93]  James D. Anderson,et al.  Standards for Indexing: Revising the American National Standard Guidelines. Z39.4 , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[94]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[95]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[96]  Valerie Braithwaite,et al.  Structure of human values: testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey , 1985 .

[97]  Peter H. Lisius AACR2 to RDA: Is Knowledge of Both Needed during the Transition Period? , 2015 .

[98]  Thomas J. Froehlich,et al.  Ethical Aspects of Library and Information Science , 2010 .

[99]  Marie-France Plassard,et al.  Functional requirements for bibliographic records : final report , 2013 .

[100]  Jordan L. Boyd-Graber,et al.  Content Analysis for Values Elicitation , 2012 .

[101]  Karen Coyle Chapter 1: Library Data in a Modern Context , 2010 .

[102]  Lua Gregory,et al.  Information Literacy and Social Justice: Radical Professional Praxis , 2013 .

[103]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  A World of Standards , 2000 .

[104]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Synthetic Ethos: The Believability of Collections at the Intersection of Classification and Curation , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[105]  Chiara Bortolotto UNESCO, cultural heritage, and outstanding universal value: value-based analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions , 2015 .

[106]  Dorothy Lee Being and Value in a Primitive Culture , 1949 .

[107]  B. Kwasnik,et al.  Changing depictions of persons in library practice: Spirits, pseudonyms, and human bookst , 2017 .

[108]  Wanda V. Dole,et al.  Values for librarians in the information age , 2001 .

[109]  S. Gewirtz,et al.  What to do about values in social research: the case for ethical reflexivity in the sociology of education , 2006 .

[111]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[112]  Donald E. Vinson,et al.  Human Values: a Historical and Interdisciplinary Analysis , 1978 .

[113]  Brian Dobreski,et al.  Metadata and Reproducibility: A Case Study of Gravitational Wave Research Data Management , 2016 .

[114]  Pnina Shachaf A global perspective on library association codes of ethics , 2005 .

[115]  Steven A. Knowlton,et al.  How the Current Draft of RDA Addresses the Cataloging of Reproductions, Facsimiles, and Microforms , 2009 .

[116]  Bohdan S. Wynar,et al.  Introduction to Cataloging and Classification , 1991 .

[117]  David Ma,et al.  Sub-Cultural Differences in Information Ethics across China: Focus On Chinese Management Generation Gaps , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[118]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[119]  Steven A. Knowlton Mlis Three decades since Prejudices and Antipathies : A study of changes in the library of congress subject headings , 2005 .

[120]  Amanda Cossham Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata , 2014 .

[121]  E F Gil,et al.  Culturally competent research: an ethical perspective. , 1999, Clinical psychology review.

[122]  Brian Dobreski,et al.  The joy of being a book: Benefits of participation in the human library , 2016, ASIST.

[123]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[124]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[125]  P. Howe The tail is wagging the dog , 2008 .

[126]  Brian Dobreski,et al.  Ontology Informed Design to Advance Developers' Informal Online Learning , 2018, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[127]  Richard Lee Hasenyager,et al.  Convenience to the Cataloger or Convenience to the User?: An Exploratory Study of Catalogers’ Judgment , 2015 .

[128]  Seymour Lubetzky Cataloging rules and principles : a critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision : prepared for the Board on Cataloging Policy and Research of the A.L.A. Division of Cataloging and Classification , 1953 .

[129]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[130]  Marilyn Lutz,et al.  Using the Community Information Format to Create Public Service Resource Network , 1992 .

[131]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[132]  Chris Oliver,et al.  Evaluation of RDA as an Implementation of FRBR and FRAD , 2012 .

[133]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[134]  R. Fisher Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[135]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Studying the values of hard-to-reach populations: content analysis of tweets by the 21st century homeless , 2012, iConference '12.

[136]  S. Lilley The Impact of Cultural Values on Maori Information Behaviour , 2012 .

[137]  Richard P. Smiraglia Bibliocentrism Revisited: RDA and FRBRoo , 2015 .

[138]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[139]  Yang Wang,et al.  CAN: composable accessibility infrastructure via data-driven crowdsourcing , 2015, W4A.

[140]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[141]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[142]  Philip Hider,et al.  The Use of RDA Elements in Support of FRBR User Tasks , 2013 .

[143]  Elvin Hatch Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology , 1983 .

[144]  J. Trant Emerging convergence? Thoughts on museums, archives, libraries, and professional training , 2009 .

[145]  Laura Skouvig,et al.  Knowledge Organization: A Sociohistorical Analysis and Critique , 2006, The Library Quarterly.