Integrating Motivating and Constraining Forces in Deviance Causation: A Test of Causal Chain Hypotheses in Control Balance Theory

ABSTRACT A major innovation in control balance theory is the integration of motivating and constraining forces into a “causal chain” explanation of deviance. To test these relationships, this research presents a parsed model of the causal chain that focuses on the associations among control ratios, deviant motivation, situational provocations, constraint, and deviant behavior. Results from a first-person scenario testing hypotheses from this model show that, as predicted, control ratios affect deviance both directly and indirectly through motivating and constraining variables. While the full model explains about 39% of the variation in deviance, control ratios do not, however, show great explanatory power regarding variation in motivation and constraint.

[1]  R. Agnew.  Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency , 1992, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[2]  C. R. Tittle,et al.  Continuing the Discussion of Control Balance , 1999 .

[3]  J. Braithwaite.  Crime, shame and reintegration: Contents , 1989 .

[4]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[5]  T. P. Thornberry,et al.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIONAL THEORY OF DELINQUENCY , 1987 .

[6]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction , 1993 .

[7]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[8]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Refining control balance theory , 2004 .

[9]  R. Gregory Dunaway,et al.  An Application of Control Balance Theory to Incarcerated Sex Offenders , 1998 .

[10]  Charles R. Tittle.  Thoughts Stimulated by Braithwaite's Analysis of Control Balance Theory , 1997 .

[11]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Extending Tittle's Control Balance Theory to Account for Victimization , 2003 .

[12]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Crime, Shame, And Reintegration , 1989 .

[13]  J. Savelsberg.  Review of Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance by Charles R. Tittle , 1996 .

[14]  J. Savelsberg.  Human Nature and Social Control in Complex Society: , 1999 .

[15]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Control Balance: Toward A General Theory Of Deviance , 1995 .

[16]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[17]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale , 2001 .

[18]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[19]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .

[20]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY* , 1999 .

[21]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[22]  D. Ward,et al.  Modeling the Deterrent Effects of Punishment , 1986 .

[23]  J. Braithwaite.  Charles Tittle's Control Balance and Criminological Theory , 1997 .

[24]  G. Jensen.  A Critique of Control Balance Theory: , 1999 .

[25]  D. Bishop,et al.  Legal and Extralegal Barriers to Delinquency , 1984 .

[26]  Matthew Hickman, Alex Piquero.  exploring the relationships between gender, control balance, and deviance , 2001 .

[27]  A. Piquero,et al.  Control Ratios and Defiant Acts of Deviance: Assessing Additive and Conditional Effects with Constraints and Impulsivity , 2003 .

[28]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Applying Tittle’s control balance theory to police deviance , 2001 .