Neurobiological degeneracy: A key property for functional adaptations of perception and action to constraints

A crucial aspect of understanding human behavior relates to how perception and action sub-systems are integrated during coordinated and controlled movement in goal-directed activity. Here we discuss how a neurobiological system property, degeneracy (i.e., many coordinative structures to achieve one function), can help us understand how skilled individuals functionally adapt perception and action to interacting constraints during performance. Since most research investigating degeneracy has been conducted in neuroanatomy, genetics and theoretical neurobiology, here we clarify how degeneracy is exhibited in perceptual-motor systems. Using an ecological dynamics framework, we highlight how degeneracy underpins the functional role of movement coordination variability in performance of multi-articular tasks. Following that, we discuss how degenerate neurobiological systems are able to exploit system stability and flexibility in their movement coordination. Third, we show how better coupling of information and movement could lead individuals to explore functionally degenerate behaviors. Last, we explore how degeneracy can support pluri-potentiality (i.e., one coordinative structure for many perceptual-motor functions) as a way toward innovation or refinement in performance.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological foundations of cognition. I: Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems , 1999 .

[2]  H. Haken Synergetics: an Introduction, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology , 1977 .

[3]  Keith Davids,et al.  How boxers decide to punch a target: emergent behaviour in nonlinear dynamical movement systems. , 2006, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[4]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ludovic Seifert,et al.  Key Properties of Expert Movement Systems in Sport , 2013, Sports Medicine.

[6]  K. Davids,et al.  Ecological dynamics and motor learning design in sport , 2012 .

[7]  Ludovic Seifert,et al.  Neurobiological degeneracy: supporting stability, flexibility and pluripotentiality in complex motor skill. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[8]  D. Chollet,et al.  Do qualitative changes in interlimb coordination lead to effectiveness of aquatic locomotion rather than efficiency? , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[9]  Keith Davids,et al.  Metastability and emergent performance of dynamic interceptive actions. , 2012, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[10]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[11]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Movement systems as dynamical systems : The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine , 2003 .

[12]  M L Latash,et al.  On the problem of adequate language in motor control. , 1998, Motor control.

[13]  K. Davids,et al.  The intending-perceiving-acting cycle in sports performance , 2013 .

[14]  Keith Davids,et al.  Coordination Pattern Variability Provides Functional Adaptations to Constraints in Swimming Performance , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[15]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  Keith Davids,et al.  Affordance-controlled bifurcations of action patterns in martial arts. , 2006, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degeneracy and redundancy in cognitive anatomy , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Learning in the brain–computer interface: insights about degrees of freedom and degeneracy from a landscape model of motor learning , 2005, Cognitive Processing.

[19]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Ecological Psychology: Six Principles for an Embodied–Embedded Approach to Behavior , 2008 .

[20]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy) , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[22]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[23]  James M. Whitacre,et al.  Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems , 2009, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[24]  Keith Davids,et al.  Expert Performance in Sport , 2015 .

[25]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The Effects of Practice on Coordination , 2014, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[26]  Simon Jenkins,et al.  Extended Book Review: Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-Led Approach , 2008 .

[27]  S. Bennett,et al.  Extended Book Review: Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-Led Approach , 2007 .

[28]  K M Newell,et al.  Change in the Organization of Degrees of Freedom With Learning , 2006, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  Ludovic Seifert,et al.  Skill transfer specificity shapes perception and action under varying environmental constraints. , 2016, Human movement science.

[30]  Ludovic Seifert,et al.  Coordination Pattern Adaptability: Energy Cost of Degenerate Behaviors , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  G. Edelman,et al.  Solving Bernstein's problem: a proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. , 1993, Child development.

[32]  W A Sparrow,et al.  The efficiency of skilled performance. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  D. Araújo,et al.  Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency , 2012 .

[34]  K. Davids,et al.  What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition , 2011 .

[35]  K. Davids,et al.  The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport , 2006 .

[36]  K. Davids,et al.  1 1 2 Adaptive and phase transition behavior in 3 performance of discrete multi-articular 4 actions by degenerate neurobiological 5 systems 6 7 8 , 2010 .

[37]  K. Davids,et al.  Perception of Affordances in Multi-Scale Dynamics as an Alternative Explanation for Equivalence of Analogical and Inferential Reasoning in Animals and Humans , 2010 .

[38]  K. Davids,et al.  Neurobiological Degeneracy and Affordance Perception Support Functional Intra-Individual Variability of Inter-Limb Coordination during Ice Climbing , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  Sparrow Wa The efficiency of skilled performance. , 1983 .

[40]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Changing Up the Routine: Intervention-Induced Variability in Motor Learning , 2013, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[41]  K. Newell,et al.  Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy , 1998 .

[42]  Andrea Scarantino,et al.  Affordances Explained , 2003, Philosophy of Science.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions , 2004, Journal of anatomy.

[44]  M. Turvey,et al.  Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. , 2009 .

[45]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Memory for the Functional Characteristics of Climbing Walls: Perceiving Affordances , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  G Tononi,et al.  Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Keith Davids,et al.  Intentions, Perceptions and Actions Constrain Functional Intra- and Inter-Individual Variability in the Acquisition of Expertise in Individual Sports , 2012 .

[48]  Michael A. Riley,et al.  Learning From the Body About the Mind , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[49]  R. Emmerik,et al.  On Variability and Stability in Human Movement , 2000 .

[50]  Keith Davids,et al.  Dynamics of multi-articular coordination in neurobiological systems. , 2009, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  C Button,et al.  Inter-individual variability in the upper-lower limb breaststroke coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.

[53]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Hidden in plain view: degeneracy in complex systems , 2015, Biosyst..

[54]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[56]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Movement Systems as Dynamical Systems , 2003, Sports medicine.

[57]  J. Whitacre Genetic and environment-induced pathways to innovation: on the possibility of a universal relationship between robustness and adaptation in complex biological systems , 2011, Evolutionary Ecology.

[58]  K. Davids,et al.  The concept of 'Organismic Asymmetry' in sport science. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[59]  K. Davids,et al.  Information for regulating action in sport: Metastability and emergence of tactical solutions under ecological constraints , 2009 .

[60]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Direct Learning , 2007 .

[61]  Paul H. Mason,et al.  Degeneracy at Multiple Levels of Complexity , 2010 .

[62]  Keith Davids,et al.  Deconstructing Neurobiological Coordination: The Role of the Biomechanics-Motor Control Nexus , 2010, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[63]  Axel Bender,et al.  Degeneracy: a design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  Paul H. Mason,et al.  Degeneracy: Demystifying and destigmatizing a core concept in systems biology , 2015, Complex..